(2020-12-19, 03:42 PM)OmniVersalNexus Wrote: It unfortunately doesn't make me as confident as I would like to be because last time I checked, most vocal (pseudo)skeptics think Parnia is a 'biased charlatan with an agenda' who tried to 'explain away' his research from AWARE I. They won't listen to him anyways.
Do YOU think Parnia is a 'biased charlatan with an agenda'?
That is, are you either
a) an extreme sceptic
or
b) someone who places his trust in extreme sceptics?
I think you need to decide where you stand. You are free to plant your feet on whichever piece of ground suits you, there's no problem with your doing so. I find your viewpoint or position confusing, perhaps even not entirely honest. I should apologise for expressing things that way, but maybe you are not being quite open and straightforward about something.