Fine tuning?

I wonder if Drew Berry is aware of the probable impact of his animations on the origin of life debate, and perhaps the entire theory of evolution by natural selection. Imagine if James Tour had used one of those films as part of his debate on life's origins (I assume he didn't because I couldn't stand their awful descent into simply calling each other liars - I wondered how they avoided actually coming to blows.

I hope the science-DI community (as opposed to the Bible-bashing DI community) make good use of those amazing films.

David

I wondered the same but that initial 2 minutes of introduction to the second video(above) seems to indicate that the makers of the video are all firmly with the orthodox NS/RM camp. Again I have to state the disclaimer that I have no scientific training but, having done so, I find it a conundrum as to how DNA evolved in that manner when it is present in the first biological cells to appear on this planet. Which means it is PRE-evolutionary (Darwinian evolution describes organic, cell-based evolution). That elephant in the room seems to be ignored by the evolutionists and it is why people like James Tour get so heated in debates.

I try to be open-minded and I have read arguments for pre-DNA, RNA-World evolution but I've also read how these arguments can be easily dismissed (e.g. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3495036/ ). So we, as the lay public, are not being honestly served by our scientific community who seem hell-bent on maintaining a materialist, neo-darwinian front. It seems to me that there is no appetite to even question that adherence or look at alternatives. Anyone who does is ostracised and anyone who wants to know about alternatives only have the DI, with its evangelist baggage, to turn to.