(2018-01-23, 05:28 AM)darkcheese Wrote: It's not that its inefficient, its the predicted result of the neodarwinian theory (working with whats available to you. The same overall design was carried over from say, fish, and due to the changing morphology of the animals, the same overall route is used, even when it seems odd (giraffes).
Do you realize how arbitrary it is to propose that another, theoretical, route would be more "intelligent" (a subjective concept in its own right) when the current one works?
"Deep into that darkness peering, long I stood there, wondering, fearing, doubting, dreaming dreams no mortal ever dared to dream before..."
(This post was last modified: 2018-01-23, 04:09 PM by E. Flowers.)