(2017-08-21, 08:39 PM)Sciborg_S_Patel Wrote: [ -> ]In at least two of those cases there's accepted evidence right?
At what point is it ok to speculate over crimes committed by individuals while providing "evidence" on the level of Alex's insistence that we can just use Google Image Search?
I was offended that I (and others) were accused of being not as offended by shit/bizarro art as others wanted me (us) to be
Is it possible to embed tweets into our posts?
*whistles innocently*
Well, it's slightly over a week since the poll started, so let's declare the results. "Yes" wins at 19 votes out of 33, roughly 58%, a definitive majority:
Should conspiracy theory / political discussion be allowed on this forum?
Code:
Yes 19 57.58%
No 3 9.09%
Only those closely related to the core Psience Quest topics
11 33.33%
Now, let's poll on the question as to where political/CT discussions may be held on the forum. Here are some potential poll options. These suggestions are from memory: I haven't gone through the thread as I said I would, so I hope that if I have missed any option that anybody thinks should be included, that person speaks up:
Proposed poll: where within the Psience Quest forums may political/CT discussions be held?
- Within the "Other Stuff" forum by creating a new thread for each political/CT topic.
- Within two individual threads in the "Other Stuff" forum: one for politics and one for CTs.
- Within two sub-forums within the "Other Stuff" forum (with the sub-forums being publicly visible).
- As above but with the sub-forums being visible to logged-in members only.
- As above but with the sub-forums being visible only to members of a particular usergroup. Individual members will be able to join and leave this/these usergroup(s) themselves (assuming this is possible, which I think it is; if not possible, they will have to ask an admin to add/remove them).
Thoughts?
(2017-08-30, 08:18 AM)Laird Wrote: [ -> ]Now, let's poll on the question as to where political/CT discussions may be held on the forum.
Also, to try to speed this process up, let's call the next poll after five days rather than seven - very little changed in the final two days of polling for this poll. As always, raise objections if you have any.
The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
(2017-08-30, 10:02 AM)Laird Wrote: [ -> ]Also, to try to speed this process up, let's call the next poll after five days rather than seven - very little changed in the final two days of polling for this poll. As always, raise objections if you have any.
10 days or 2 weeks instead of 5 days, I'd say. In time for the forum's occasionals to have a say.
(2017-08-30, 02:24 PM)Ninshub Wrote: [ -> ]10 days or 2 weeks instead of 5 days, I'd say. In time for the forum's occasionals to have a say.
OK. I guess there's no rush.
(2017-08-30, 08:18 AM)Laird Wrote: [ -> ]Now, let's poll on the question as to where political/CT discussions may be held on the forum. Here are some potential poll options.
Since nobody has raised any objection or even comment after more than 24 hours (aside from Ian's comments re timeframe), I have
initiated the poll. Please raise any/all objections right here!
Does anyone have any strong feeling about any of the options? Any reason one choice may be better than any of the others. It seems like all the choices segregate that stuff somewhere under Other. That seems good.
Hey Chuck. I'm influenced by at least one member who has told me that anything that takes bandwidth from the main focus of the forum might cause this member to leave - and I suspect that this member is not the only one who feels this way. Given this, I feel most strongly about the most restrictive option, which has the smallest possibility of taking bandwidth away from the main focus of the forum, whilst at the same time allowing for the possibility of the discussions which clearly the majority of the membership feels should be permissible.