2017-08-16, 07:06 PM
(2017-08-16, 03:46 PM)E. Flowers Wrote: [ -> ]I just visited Skeptiko... Apparently Alex is deleting the spirituality section as well and when asked if he would explain what the new Skeptiko is going to be about he responded "I just did... [podcast] 357 [the one about Pizzagate]". Without spirituality, it seems like Skeptiko has completed its transition into a place where only CTs, politics and the mandatory religious bashing are allowed. And with it getting fully "stuck on" CTs, I see it as equivalent to the subforum that is being requested... That is exactly what Skeptiko is going to be within a year, just give it enough time for the hardcore conspiracists to arrive and settle in the ruins.
In such a scenario, I would advice Alex to change the name of the podcast / forum to "Infowarrico".
______________________________________________________________
As for conspiracy theories... We cannot avoid them completely for the two reasons:
1) real conspiracies do happen, and ignoring this fact won't help;
2) some conspiracy theories are notably better than the most, and do deserve some intellectual contemplation (that's why 9/11 Truth and JFK Assasination, as well as Deep Politics analysis in general, have some genuinely rational thinkers like David Ray Griffin in their ranks).
Yet I would also agree that many - not all, but many - conspiracy theories are indeed sheer nonsense ("global depopulation agenda", Pizzagate and many others fit this description neatly).
And, as I once said on Skeptiko, looking into them is like walking on a thin ice - every step should be taken very carefully.
So, I think that providing them a special subsection is good choice - this way, we will allow conspiracy controversies to become a legitimate subject of debate (which they should be) without allowing them to spread across the whole forum and dominate it (which has happened on Skeptiko, and which we should prevent).
Discussions going into conspiracy controversies should be transferred to the relevant special subsection, with exception of the ones which are directly related to the main topic of the forum. Such directly related, and thus allowed beyond the special subsection, conspiracy controversies should be:
1) organised and (temporarily and/or partially) covert misdeeds of the paranormal skeptics, such as sTARBABY scandal, Randi's Alpha Project, Guerilla Skepticism on Wikipedia, etc.;
2) corruption and repression in science and medicine - for example, Big Pharma's buying of medical doctors and scientists, attacks on cold fusion / LENR research, etc.
Such is my opinion.