Just returning to the original subject of this thread, none of the recent discussion here is supporting the professor. As I understand it, he basically holds a Dawkins-like position - all evolution is attributed to RM+NS. However, I don't listen to the professor regularly!!
David
(This post was last modified: 2025-01-20, 08:55 AM by David001. Edited 1 time in total.)
(Yesterday, 04:06 PM)nbtruthman Wrote: I've now waited a while and Stephenw hasn't responded to my request for plausible rebuttals to some of the major arguments for ID, where ID seriously conflicts with the Third Way concepts. In the abscence of such plausible rebuttals I have to assume there are none and ID is by far the preferred concept to explain the actual observed process of evolution, the irreducible complexity in the organization of living organisms, etc. and as also exemplified by the fossil record.
Did you watch Farina's videos?
'Historically, we may regard materialism as a system of dogma set up to combat orthodox dogma...Accordingly we find that, as ancient orthodoxies disintegrate, materialism more and more gives way to scepticism.'
- Bertrand Russell