Remote viewing of the future:- sample predictions

Food for thought: remote viewing techniques used for future predictions. It will be interesting to get the final presented paper.

Excerpts from the Abstract of a paper to be presented at the upcoming 41st annual conference of the Society for Scientific Exploration (SSE):

2060: A TESTED PROGRAM TO ACQUIRE PRAGMATICALLY USEFUL
INFORMATION FROM THE FUTURE
Stephan A. Schwartz
California Institute of Human Science, BIAL Foundation, and Atlantic
University
Introduction: This is a preliminary report on a 45-year-long ongoing project using precognitive remote
viewing to describe the future. For almost 50 years, information derived nonlocally through the use of
established remote viewing protocols has provided pragmatically useful information. The Research
Director of this project, Stephan Schwartz, developed and employed a protocol using multiple viewers, the
Mobius Consensus Protocol, and concept-by-concept accuracy analysis by independent experts. It resulted
in the discovery of archaeological sites both terrestrial and marine throughout the world.
.................................................
Results: A selection of preliminary observations about the future
.................................................
.................................................
In 2018, with funding from the BIAL Fundaçåo and Atlantic University, a third phase of this research
was begun involving very specific populations and is now ongoing. A preliminary survey of the 2060 data
reveals certain notable trends:
• Between 2040 and 2045 several very dramatic changes alter the structure of human culture
worldwide. It is not yet clear what they are, but two candidates seem to be climate change and the
end of the carbon energy era, which will have major technological and geopolitical implications.
• Climate change and the associated sea rise have caused the submergence of many coastal cities
and subsequent massive internal and international migrations for which much of the world is
notably ill-prepared.
• People have largely reorganized into small communities.
• The United States still exists at least in form, but real political power has devolved to states and
regions, because of the radically different way in which states have planned for and
accommodated climate change and these migrations.
• In the U.S. the illness profit system of healthcare seems to have given way to universal birthright
single-payer healthcare, much more like the present European model.

Food for thought: remote viewing techniques used for future predictions. It will be interesting to get the final presented paper.

Excerpts from the Abstract of a paper to be presented at the upcoming 41st annual conference of the Society for Scientific Exploration (SSE):

I suppose these results imply that the human race will not/didn't blow itself up over this period, which is certainly encouraging.

David

[Ninshub]

I wonder if all the "data" focuses so exclusively on the U.S.?

All the climate change stuff was predictable without the need for remote viewing.  People have been predicting such since at least the 1970s.  Facts about global warming coupled with a small knowledge of sociology and a little logic is pretty much all you need.  Universal healthcare is a bit of a stunner but on its own, it's not entirely inconceivable that this was just a lucky guess.

All the climate change stuff was predictable without the need for remote viewing.  People have been predicting such since at least the 1970s.  Facts about global warming coupled with a small knowledge of sociology and a little logic is pretty much all you need.  Universal healthcare is a bit of a stunner but on its own, it's not entirely inconceivable that this was just a lucky guess.

Actually, in 1970 the scientific consensus was that the Earth was cooling and that the danger was of a new ice age!

Without extending into controversy, let me just say that my trust in scientific climate predictions is at the same level as my trust in conventional evolutionary theories!

David

[Ninshub]

I agree with Brian about trends 1 and 2, given our current knowledge. Trends 3 to 5 are less immediately "highly probable". It will be interesting to see if there are more specific and less obvious predictions.

Without particularly agreeing or disagreeing with these predictions, I will say they seem more modest and restrained than many ideas of the future. In the past I've come across many really, really big changes predicted for the future, such as shifting of the earth's poles, sinking of large sections of continents (not just coastal regions) beneath the sea and arising of new land masses. By comparison the predictions here seem more like "business as usual", despite the phrasing used such as "several very dramatic changes".