Why Do People See Elves And Other "Entities" When They Smoke DMT?
Could these entities have some sort of real existence? It turns out that no neural activation hypothesis can work very well with this phenomenon. As the researcher states, "...it’s very difficult to (neurologically) account for certain highly common and typical experiences such as having one’s emotions harvested by a giant praying mantis. “Is there a specific region of the brain that for some reason is hardwired to produce those types of experiences?” he asks. “I don’t think so. It’s too specific to fit this generic brain activation model.”
By the way, apparently the general take-away impression of experiencers is positive (one Johns Hopkins study came up with 78%) regarding these entities, including the emotion-sucking-from-the-brain giant praying mantises.
Another article on DMT entities:
The Society for Scientific Exploration had a paper presented on this subject at one of its conferences, an interesting analysis of DMT entity reports by Jennifer A. Lyke of Stockton University (albeit with a much smaller sample size than the Johns Hopkins study):
(This post was last modified: 2022-01-17, 10:58 PM by nbtruthman.)
Could these entities have some sort of real existence? It turns out that no neural activation hypothesis can work very well with this phenomenon. As the researcher states, "...it’s very difficult to (neurologically) account for certain highly common and typical experiences such as having one’s emotions harvested by a giant praying mantis. “Is there a specific region of the brain that for some reason is hardwired to produce those types of experiences?” he asks. “I don’t think so. It’s too specific to fit this generic brain activation model.”
By the way, apparently the general take-away impression of experiencers is positive (one Johns Hopkins study came up with 78%) regarding these entities, including the emotion-sucking-from-the-brain giant praying mantises.
Quote:Of the 2,561 DMT users surveyed by the Johns Hopkins team, 65 percent said their encounter filled them with “joy”, while 63 percent experienced a sense of “trust”, and 59 percent went as far as to describe their experience as “love”. Negative emotions like sadness, disgust, and anger, meanwhile, were reported by a small minority of respondents.
Many claimed to have received messages from these entities about the nature of reality, while others gained more banal insights – including one person who received instruction on the rules of the NFL. “On the whole people generally have meaningful encounters,” says Luke. “Even if there’s not a specific message there’s a sense of profundity.”
“DMT experiences can translate quite strongly into metaphysical and theological shifts,” the researcher continues. Indeed, more than half of respondents to the Johns Hopkins study who identified as atheist before their encounter no longer claimed to be so afterward. As unbelievable as all this may sound, 81 percent of respondents said their encounter felt “more real” than anything they had ever experienced previously, with two-thirds continuing to believe in the existence of these entities even after the effects of the drug had worn off.
Another article on DMT entities:
The Society for Scientific Exploration had a paper presented on this subject at one of its conferences, an interesting analysis of DMT entity reports by Jennifer A. Lyke of Stockton University (albeit with a much smaller sample size than the Johns Hopkins study):
Quote:"Entities were defined as elements of the experience that appeared to the DMT user to possess independent awareness. Seventy-five percent of reports included a description of at least one form of entity and 37% described more than one entity. There were a total of 180 experiences of entities reported. The general categories of entities that emerged were poorly defined or formless beings (29%); humanoid beings (22%); divine beings (10%); aliens (8%), elves and fairies (7%); animals (6%); geometric objects or machines (6%); voices (4%); faces (4%); and miscellaneous entities that did not fit into the other categories (3%).
.............................................
In 25% of cases, experiencers reported “showing/teaching/guidance”, 10% of the time the interaction was perceived as “hostile”, another 10% of the time there was “no interaction”. Other reported interactions were warmth or love (9%), welcome/excitement (9%), reassurance or encouragement (8%), neutrality or observation (7%), play or entertainment (4%), power or control (3%), sexuality (3%), unclear interactions (3%), questioning (3%), reminding (2%), and miscellaneous interactions that did not fit into the other categories (2%). ....These results indicate that the most commonly experienced, well-defined entities are humanoid.