@Valmar you would come accross a lot more convincing if you had any references to backup your claims.
Maybe you know Thomas Nagel personally? no, well let's look at some source:
https://iep.utm.edu/dualism-and-mind/
Providing references for claims makes a difference.
(This post was last modified: 2024-01-23, 11:02 AM by sbu. Edited 2 times in total.)
Maybe you know Thomas Nagel personally? no, well let's look at some source:
Quote:Property dualists claim that mental phenomena are non-physical properties of physical phenomena, but not properties of non-physical substances. Property dualists are not committed to the existence of non-physical substances, but are committed to the irreducibility of mental phenomena to physical phenomena.
An argument for property dualism, derived from Thomas Nagel and Saul Kripke, is as follows: We can assert that warmth is identical to mean kinetic molecular energy, despite appearances, by claiming that warmth is how molecular energy is perceived or manifested in consciousness....
https://iep.utm.edu/dualism-and-mind/
Providing references for claims makes a difference.