The question of political / conspiracy theory content

One of the subforums is called UFOs. How can you even begin to consider the subject without tying in conspiracies? It's impossible.

To be fair, there are conspiracies and then there are conspiracies.

i'd also like to say that I wish any or all of you f***ers lived next door to me so we can shoot the s***, and go fishing or go kayaking or something

So you don't think the Catholic church conspired to protect child abusers? JFK. No conspiracy there? MKULTRA? 

con·spir·a·cy
kənˈspirəsē/
noun

1. a secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful.
   "a conspiracy to destroy the government"
   synonyms:
   plot, scheme, plan, machination, ploy, trick, ruse, subterfuge; 
   informalracket
   "a conspiracy to manipulate the results"
   • the action of plotting or conspiring.
     "they were cleared of conspiracy to pervert the course of justice"
     synonyms:
     plotting, collusion, intrigue, connivance, machination, collaboration; 
     treason
     "conspiracy to commit murder"
     

My argument is that that's the whole paradoxical nature of it all... in that, yes, no matter how outlandish the conspiracy, there is always a... whaddthey call it in lawyer terms... precedent, that's it... whereas its very easy to believe your conspiracy must be true

I have never been banned from Skeptiko. 

oh, its easy as pie! lol

In at least two of those cases there's accepted evidence right?

At what point is it ok to speculate over crimes committed by individuals while providing "evidence" on the level of Alex's insistence that we can just use Google Image Search?

I was offended that I (and others) were accused of being not as offended by shit/bizarro art as others wanted me (us) to be