The question of political / conspiracy theory content

Sci & I disagree on a subject that I think should be in politics, but he thinks should be in CT. 

Could someone have a look at it please. 

Sci & I disagree on a subject that I think should be in politics, but he thinks should be in CT. 

Could someone have a look at it please. 

I think Sci feels that because it contains information that can't be validated, it remains a conspiracy theory and should be discussed as such.  I see his point and I tend to agree but I am very close to the border.

I think Sci feels that because it contains information that can't be validated, it remains a conspiracy theory and should be discussed as such.  I see his point and I tend to agree but I am very close to the border.

What can be validated on this site? Nothing much. 

There's also a deep state thread in politics that could arguably be in CT. I think we just have to be resigned to some arbitrary crossover.

When I think of CT, I only think of ones we all know. Like 9/11, JFK, TWA800 etc

When I think of CT, I only think of ones we all know. Like 9/11, JFK, TWA800 etc

Maybe that's your bias?

[Ninshub]

Sci & I disagree on a subject that I think should be in politics, but he thinks should be in CT. 

Could someone have a look at it please. 

If someone really feels that strongly about it, they can PM one of the admins. Although personally I don't care much since they're both hidden forums and there's bound to be crossover and some judgement calls - I can imagine many kinds of threads fitting both.

Maybe that's your bias?

Yeah, maybe it is.