(2017-10-02, 12:01 AM)Laird Wrote: Does it address to your satisfaction the statistical issues you raised? (I haven't made the time to read it in either form just yet)
Well, I've been slowly reading through Radin's double-slit papers, and haven't quite got to the end yet. But I am a bit clearer about things now. After a quick look at the revised version, a lot has been done to address the previous issues, and it seems reasonable as far as the V1 variable (which produces a Z value of 3.43), but I'm still not convinced about the procedure by which the V2 variable is added (or subtracted), to produce Z=4.68.
(V1 is related to the ratio of the amounts of light coming through the two slits, whereas V2 is related to a phase difference between them.)
There is still the puzzling feature that the V1 effect is in the opposite direction from the one expected.