Evolution without accidents and also no intelligence?

I hope you don't take this the wrong way, but your responses certainly aren't of a knock-down quality.  This isn't necessarily the thread for going over the defense of Behe's irreducible complexity argument anyway, but I am curious what Behe might provide in a more technical manner to the ChatGPT-offered counter points.

I did find the very last sentence of the second response from ChatGPT to be REALLY interesting:


I wonder what the source data it used to come up with the 'scientific community remains open' regarding irreducible complexity.  I realize I'm parsing the sentence in a way the bot may not have intended, but it struck me as a charitable thought.

Dr. Behe answered the main objections to the irreducible complexity of the bacterial flagellum in this podcast : https://idthefuture.com/1651/ .