The neuroscience that shows us what it's like to be a dog.
On the one hand, I agree with some of Berns' basic contentions that animals deserve better care, and that the distinction between us and them isn't so stark. But I don't know that this entirely refutes Nagel either; that a dog or a bat or a dolphin also experience joy doesn't necessarily mean their experience of it is the same as ours, or that we could understand that difference.
Quote:The neuroscientist’s latest book, What It’s Like to Be a Dog, won a Smithsonian Best Science Book prize in 2017 and was just released in paperback last month. The title is a reference to philosopher Thomas Nagel’s influential 1974 essay “What Is It Like To Be a Bat?” (pdf). Nagel argued that even with huge advances in neuroscience, humans would never understand the subjective experience of animals, using bats as an example, because we’re just too different—we don’t use sonar or fly.
Berns disagrees. He believes that we can understand how animals experience the world and start to make sense of their inner lives—and that we have more in common with our pets and livestock and the creatures of the sea than perhaps we’d like to imagine. After all, if we start to acknowledge that other living things have a rich emotional existence not too different from our own, we will be forced to question how we treat them, and perhaps change our behaviors as well.
On the one hand, I agree with some of Berns' basic contentions that animals deserve better care, and that the distinction between us and them isn't so stark. But I don't know that this entirely refutes Nagel either; that a dog or a bat or a dolphin also experience joy doesn't necessarily mean their experience of it is the same as ours, or that we could understand that difference.