As a director of ATransC, I am conducting a study of possible visual Instrumental TransCommunicaqtion examples that seem to represent nonhuman hominoids. You can see the study introduction at https://atransc.org/et-visual-itc-study/.
My objective in posting here is to see if one of you may be interested in helping grade examples. I ask here because most of you seem to practice more discernment than most people. I need someone who is discerning, analytical and able to suspend judgment in order to consider the implications of poorly composed visual evidence.
Here are the objectives of the study:
I am open to discuss the subject, including its merit and what might or might not be accomplished. My objective is to have five active graders for the closed Facebook page. I am discovering that I may need more people to achieve the active part of that, so perhaps I am looking for more than one volunteer. Let me know here or by using the contact tool at the bottom of the atransc.org pages (https://atransc.org/contact-atransc/).
Here are two examples. The left example was collected using a video loop to generate optical-frequency noise. As such, the resolution is limited to the old-style television screen. You should see a shape in the middle of the frame that resembles a camel's head looking right at you. There is a bright area in the middle of the frame which resembles the bridge of the nose. It is flanked by two dark areas that might be eyes.
The example at the right was collected by photographing light reflecting from moving water. The feature has about the same configuration as the first, thus we are considering the possibility they are of the same species. The difference in texture and color are artifacts of the technology. However, video-loop sometimes seems faithful to color. Both techniques tend to introduce distortion in the apparently intended order.
My objective in posting here is to see if one of you may be interested in helping grade examples. I ask here because most of you seem to practice more discernment than most people. I need someone who is discerning, analytical and able to suspend judgment in order to consider the implications of poorly composed visual evidence.
Here are the objectives of the study:
- Can the majority of a grading panel agree that an example submitted by practitioners is paranormal?
- Will the panel agree that an example is more likely to be extraterrestrial than earthling?
- Will more than one example of the same species be collected?
- If so, will there be sufficient information to develop a trend suggesting they are part of a race of beings?
- Will contactees recognize any of the species?
- Using examples from such a race, is it possible to request their presence in our visual ITC or EVP sessions?
I am open to discuss the subject, including its merit and what might or might not be accomplished. My objective is to have five active graders for the closed Facebook page. I am discovering that I may need more people to achieve the active part of that, so perhaps I am looking for more than one volunteer. Let me know here or by using the contact tool at the bottom of the atransc.org pages (https://atransc.org/contact-atransc/).
Here are two examples. The left example was collected using a video loop to generate optical-frequency noise. As such, the resolution is limited to the old-style television screen. You should see a shape in the middle of the frame that resembles a camel's head looking right at you. There is a bright area in the middle of the frame which resembles the bridge of the nose. It is flanked by two dark areas that might be eyes.
The example at the right was collected by photographing light reflecting from moving water. The feature has about the same configuration as the first, thus we are considering the possibility they are of the same species. The difference in texture and color are artifacts of the technology. However, video-loop sometimes seems faithful to color. Both techniques tend to introduce distortion in the apparently intended order.