Psience Quest

As a director of ATransC, I am conducting a study of possible visual Instrumental TransCommunicaqtion examples that seem to represent nonhuman hominoids. You can see the study introduction at https://atransc.org/et-visual-itc-study/.

My objective in posting here is to see if one of you may be interested in helping grade examples. I ask here because most of you seem to practice more discernment than most people. I need someone who is discerning, analytical and able to suspend judgment in order to consider the implications of poorly composed visual evidence.

Here are the objectives of the study:

1. Can the majority of a grading panel agree that an example submitted by practitioners is paranormal?
   
2. Will the panel agree that an example is more likely to be extraterrestrial than earthling?
   
3. Will more than one example of the same species be collected?
   
4. If so, will there be sufficient information to develop a trend suggesting they are part of a race of beings?
   
5. Will contactees recognize any of the species?
   
6. Using examples from such a race, is it possible to request their presence in our visual ITC or EVP sessions?
   

Given our present level of understanding, it is probably unreasonable to try to develop more information about the examples, but we are not trying to prove the existence of ETs. The main focus is on pushing the frontier a little further out as we seek to understand who we are finding in our sessions.


I am open to discuss the subject, including its merit and what might or might not be accomplished. My objective is to have five active graders for the closed Facebook page. I am discovering that I may need more people to achieve the active part of that, so perhaps I am looking for more than one volunteer. Let me know here or by using the contact tool at the bottom of the atransc.org pages (https://atransc.org/contact-atransc/).

Here are two examples. The left example was collected using a video loop to generate optical-frequency noise. As such, the resolution is limited to the old-style television screen. You should see a shape in the middle of the frame that resembles a camel's head looking right at you. There is a bright area in the middle of the frame which resembles the bridge of the nose. It is flanked by two dark areas that might be eyes.

The example at the right was collected by photographing light reflecting from moving water. The feature has about the same configuration as the first, thus we are considering the possibility they are of the same species. The difference in texture and color are artifacts of the technology. However, video-loop sometimes seems faithful to color. Both techniques tend to introduce distortion in the apparently intended order.

I gave up trying to recruit graders. At the same time, I have had a few complaints from people that the study would have no value if people could see what others thought. My solution has been to open the grading to the general public via an online form.

For discussions, the old Facebook page will act as a portal for the Idea Exchange.

Introductiomn: https://atransc.org/et-visual-itc-study/ 
Grading: https://atransc.org/et-visual-itc-study-grading-form/ 
Current submissions
  Jeremy Bloxsom: https://atransc.org/et-itc-study-jeremy-bloxsom/
  Margaret Downey: https://atransc.org/et-itc-tudy-margaret-downey/
  Amanda Jolliffe: https://atransc.org/et-itc-study-amanda-jolliffe/
  Suely Pinheir: https://atransc.org/et-itc-study-suelys-pinheiro/
  Andrés Ramos: https://atransc.org/et-itc-study-andres-ramos/
  Simone Santos: https://atransc.org/et-itc-study-simone-santos/


You are invited to participate.

By the way, I tried to recruit a few graders at the Phoenix UFO conference last week. They were polite but totally uninterested. Perhaps they think it is okay to conclude the tail of an elephant a snake.

Also, I was thinking about how interesting it would be to see a UFO during our flight there. About the time we crossed over Sedona, I noticed out the window, a line of bright white lights. No, I doubt that I witched up a UFO.

We were passing the lights, so it did not appear they were following us. We were also passing a nearby cloud formation. My guess is that the lights were contrail fragments formed by the wake of a passing jet.

Moments after seeing the balls of light, we saw a commercial jet pass under us at right angles. It was not forming a contrail, indicating that the air was pretty dry. Thus, I expect the conditions were "almost" right for contrail formation near the clouds.

I have migrated the ET Visual ITC Study to a subdomain of its own at https://et-visual-itc-study.atransc.org/.

The above links still are forwarded to their new pages.