(2023-07-26, 08:16 PM)David001 Wrote: StevenW,I did try to respond. I have no idea what TTW speak is - but maybe I speak it too. Is this what you meant?
@stephenw
Why don't we start from my post above, which highlighted the deliberate obfuscations in TTW-speak?
https://psiencequest.net/forums/thread-e...1#pid53921
Remember, you liked it, but never explicitly replied to it.
I feel I pinpointed what frustrates me about the TTW - even though I do understand the reasons why they need to write the way they do. I put quite a bit of thought into that post, and if you don't want to respond, I don't see much point in continuing our discussion. I don't mind you disagreeing with what I wrote, I just want to hear your response.
David
Quote: However, to achieve a useful result, that would mean that the mind of the organism contained some effective model of how a gene operates and all the detailed biochemistry involved. (Incidentally, this is what I assume the real designer must have in his mind or maybe in something equivalent to a computer.)
If so - I would try again.