Regarding Wikipedia was discussing Bohm with a group of friends and found his Wikipedia page to be more balanced. It mentions his interest in consciousness and his working with the mystic Krishnamurti.
I think when a scientist has enough fans like Bohm does, many in academia itself, you can correct for the people who would want to label anything "pseudo-science" that doesn't fit the materialist faith.
Funny how the "pseudo-science" label doesn't apply to MWI...
Anyway I wouldn't worry overmuch about Wikipedia, one day this current generation of pseudo-skeptics sitting on the pages will move on and it will correct. That or Wikipedia will implode as an organization.
p.s. As for general academic acceptance of Psi it seems to me my prediction of 25-30 years is still on track. :-)
I think when a scientist has enough fans like Bohm does, many in academia itself, you can correct for the people who would want to label anything "pseudo-science" that doesn't fit the materialist faith.
Funny how the "pseudo-science" label doesn't apply to MWI...
Anyway I wouldn't worry overmuch about Wikipedia, one day this current generation of pseudo-skeptics sitting on the pages will move on and it will correct. That or Wikipedia will implode as an organization.
p.s. As for general academic acceptance of Psi it seems to me my prediction of 25-30 years is still on track. :-)
'Historically, we may regard materialism as a system of dogma set up to combat orthodox dogma...Accordingly we find that, as ancient orthodoxies disintegrate, materialism more and more gives way to scepticism.'
- Bertrand Russell
(This post was last modified: 2021-12-28, 07:15 PM by Sciborg_S_Patel.)
- Bertrand Russell
![[-]](https://psiencequest.net/forums/images/collapse.png)