Has Skeptiko gone completely wacko?

Hi Hurm

I disagree.

Surely it’s quite normal to critique other forums, especially one that many of us have been so heavily involved with in the past? I mourn the old Skeptiko and think it very useful to comment on the possible reasons why things moved on, and the direction in which things seem to be moving.

You may say that it’s a bit ‘tacky’ to write about certain individuals in a negative manner, but under the circumstances, I think pointing out ‘unusual’ posts is fair game. David’s mediation was a big part in the ‘downfall’ of Skeptiko and the formation of this forum. I think his position ought to allow some criticism. After all, I don’t think the spirit of it is nasty. Malf was adding some light hearted teasing, I think most would recognise the overreaction by David.

I do think that we ought to remember that when we point the finger at others, three more point back at us. 

I can’t ever remember a situation that you have been critical of others, it may be fair to say. But I do think Malf’s contribution added something positive to the thread despite his posts slightly ‘edgy’ nature. I think that it was worth pointing out David’s reaction.

Oh I don't know. You're probably right. I've always enjoyed Malf's comments. And I'm glad Psiencequest split off from Skeptiko although the whole process felt like a church split with a little bit of unnecessary drama. IMO, the purpose of a "critique" should be to change something for the better... not sure how this thread is doing that. So it seemed to me the purpose was to label a set of ideas, a group of people, and the personal journey of Alex as "wacko"... you know... putting others down and getting others to join in so as to feel superior and validated. I probably wouldn't have bothered to voice my opinion, but I'd had an adult beverage for the first time in a while so my tolerance was down. So anyway, carry on!