Just a reminder that the Global Consciousness Project has provided a lot of information on its website. This includes a page with details of who originated each hypothesis and links to further information about individual events, often discussing the thinking behind the hypotheses. If people are interested, they can learn more here:
http://noosphere.princeton.edu/results.html
Incidentally, a comment was made earlier which seemed to imply that Dean Radin was heavily involved in the selection of hypotheses early in the project. As far as the Formal Hypothesis Registry is concerned, that is not the case. Radin is noted as an originator for only 4 out of the 513 hypotheses, 3 of them jointly with Nelson and others. None of these 4 events produced a significant result. One of them (number 81) was among the 13 events excluded by Bancel because they weren't prespecified or were ambiguous.
Radin did publish an additional post hoc analysis of the GPC data for 9/11, but that was separate from the Formal Hypothesis series.
http://noosphere.princeton.edu/results.html
Incidentally, a comment was made earlier which seemed to imply that Dean Radin was heavily involved in the selection of hypotheses early in the project. As far as the Formal Hypothesis Registry is concerned, that is not the case. Radin is noted as an originator for only 4 out of the 513 hypotheses, 3 of them jointly with Nelson and others. None of these 4 events produced a significant result. One of them (number 81) was among the 13 events excluded by Bancel because they weren't prespecified or were ambiguous.
Radin did publish an additional post hoc analysis of the GPC data for 9/11, but that was separate from the Formal Hypothesis series.
![[-]](https://psiencequest.net/forums/images/collapse.png)