The Global Consciousness Project

[Laird]

Yes, but it has no relevance to my response: assuming honest reporting, the null hypothesis can be decisively rejected. You do accept that?

Edit: I see you edited your post. To be clear: the above was in response to your "You do know whom Mr. Nelson was?" In response to your additions: I understand all of that already. Nobody's saying the effect size is huge (it isn't). But whatever the limitations to p-values are, a value this small justifies decisively rejecting the null hypothesis - on the assumption that the procedure and results have been reported accurately. If you don't accept that, then it would be helpful if you explained why.