(2018-04-05, 01:45 PM)Dante Wrote: The main post was about atheism. It does not matter at all what his thoughts on psi are - those don't make his points about atheism any more or less valid
Let me also point out his entire diatribe is one assertion after another. Why should you or anyone stand with him or against him? How do you know his points are valid or not valid? You don't. You and every member like his points simply because you don't like atheism, atheists and what it all stands for a materialistic mechanistic it all happen by chance non spiritual view of reality more or less ( meaning members have various degrees how much tolerance they prefer for that perspective). That is an assertion. Is this a correct observation or not? You tell me.
Just so you aren't confused in thinking I support Dawkins, Hitchens and whatnot I don't. Frankly, I'm not all that interested in what they say or said.