Transubstantiation and hylemorphism

4 Replies, 621 Views

Transubstantiation and hylemorphism

Feser


Quote:The other day I was asked a very interesting question: Can transubstantiation be formulated in terms of a mechanistic conception of physical substance rather than a hylemorphic one?  My answer was that I would not peremptorily say that it cannot be, but that the suggestion certainly raises serious philosophical and theological problems.

Here’s why...
'Historically, we may regard materialism as a system of dogma set up to combat orthodox dogma...Accordingly we find that, as ancient orthodoxies disintegrate, materialism more and more gives way to scepticism.'

- Bertrand Russell


[-] The following 1 user Likes Sciborg_S_Patel's post:
  • Ninshub
This post has been deleted.
“The other day I was asked a very interesting question: Can transubstantiation be formulated in terms of a mechanistic conception of physical substance rather than a hylemorphic one?  My answer was that I would not peremptorily say that it cannot be, but that the suggestion certainly raises serious philosophical and theological problems.“

Christ almighty...  Wink
[-] The following 4 users Like Obiwan's post:
  • Typoz, Ninshub, Oleo, Sciborg_S_Patel
(2019-10-17, 05:18 PM)Obiwan Wrote: “The other day I was asked a very interesting question: Can transubstantiation be formulated in terms of a mechanistic conception of physical substance rather than a hylemorphic one?  My answer was that I would not peremptorily say that it cannot be, but that the suggestion certainly raises serious philosophical and theological problems.“

Christ almighty...  Wink
Could make a good chat-up line.
[-] The following 3 users Like Typoz's post:
  • Laird, Sciborg_S_Patel, Obiwan
(2019-10-19, 07:32 PM)Typoz Wrote: Could make a good chat-up line.
Lol quite!
[-] The following 3 users Like Obiwan's post:
  • Laird, Typoz, Sciborg_S_Patel

  • View a Printable Version
Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)