@sbu
Bearing in mind that I am not a Christian, I am inclined to believe that the anomalies that Egnor describes are real. Put yourself in the position of other neuroscientists. They probably encounter some of this stuff and don't write it down because from their standpoint, it doesn't make sense.
I'd say not recording phenomena that 'don't make sense' is more understandable than inventing lies to justify an extreme position.
There is a lot in this book that is really valuable - unless you take the view that it is all made up - and it is extremely relevant to the question of nature of consciousness.
David
Bearing in mind that I am not a Christian, I am inclined to believe that the anomalies that Egnor describes are real. Put yourself in the position of other neuroscientists. They probably encounter some of this stuff and don't write it down because from their standpoint, it doesn't make sense.
I'd say not recording phenomena that 'don't make sense' is more understandable than inventing lies to justify an extreme position.
There is a lot in this book that is really valuable - unless you take the view that it is all made up - and it is extremely relevant to the question of nature of consciousness.
David
![[-]](https://psiencequest.net/forums/images/collapse.png)