Should members be permitted to delete large swathes of their posts from threads to which they've contributed?
No (because it destroys the continuity and integrity of the threads, and spoils them for other readers/contributors).
33.33%
5
Yes (because it's their content and they should be free to decide whether or not it remains publicly visible on this forum).
40.00%
6
Not unless they have a good reason (because we should tread a nuanced middle ground here).
26.67%
4
15 vote(s)
* You voted for this item.

Should mass deletion of one's own posts be permitted?

203 Replies, 15336 Views

(2020-05-08, 09:08 PM)Laird Wrote: Right, so, sometimes there's a need for un-un-publishing.

Or is a betrayal to depend on a community for content and then override their right to remove their contribution?

I'm not saying it's one way or the other, just that it's interesting how this question seems to be something that will continually come up in different forms.
'Historically, we may regard materialism as a system of dogma set up to combat orthodox dogma...Accordingly we find that, as ancient orthodoxies disintegrate, materialism more and more gives way to scepticism.'

- Bertrand Russell


(2020-05-08, 08:10 PM)Sciborg_S_Patel Wrote: How one programmer broke the internet by deleting a tiny piece of code
I found this account of events an interesting read. Having worked in software development, I'm aware of the need for tight control over source code (and executable code too). However, those sorts of critical dependencies, where a change to a single binary digit could wreak havoc, is far away from the world we deal with on a discussion forum. I would not draw any conclusions from the refined and artificial environment of computer technology. On the contrary, I'd suggest that other than an entertaining distraction, that doesn't have any relevance here.
[-] The following 3 users Like Typoz's post:
  • Sciborg_S_Patel, Brian, Laird
(2020-05-09, 11:09 AM)Typoz Wrote: I'd suggest that other than an entertaining distraction, that doesn't have any relevance here.

Agreed - the point I "drew" from it was just a cheeky one.
(2020-05-09, 11:09 AM)Typoz Wrote: I found this account of events an interesting read. Having worked in software development, I'm aware of the need for tight control over source code (and executable code too). However, those sorts of critical dependencies, where a change to a single binary digit could wreak havoc, is far away from the world we deal with on a discussion forum. I would not draw any conclusions from the refined and artificial environment of computer technology. On the contrary, I'd suggest that other than an entertaining distraction, that doesn't have any relevance here.

Oh yeah, it was meant only as an interesting parallel. Agreed on all your points.
'Historically, we may regard materialism as a system of dogma set up to combat orthodox dogma...Accordingly we find that, as ancient orthodoxies disintegrate, materialism more and more gives way to scepticism.'

- Bertrand Russell



  • View a Printable Version
Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)