The "Rosalie" case, in which Harry Price claimed to have witnessed the bodily materialisation of a dead child at a London seance in 1937 - but to be unable to publish verifiable details because he had promised not to - presents an interesting puzzle. Some documentary clues survived, but subsequent researchers weren't able to match them to any real location. Two years Paul Adams published a book on the case, entitled "The Enigma of Rosalie: Harry Price's Paranormal Mystery Revisited":
http://whitecrowbooks.com/books/page/the...revisited/
Although the book had been diligently researched, I'm afraid I didn't find Adams's proposed solution at all convincing. I was a bit surprised that Tom Ruffles's online review for the SPR was so positive:
https://www.spr.ac.uk/book-review/enigma...paul-adams
Now an even more positive review by Alan Murdie has been published in the SPR Journal.
I wondered whether anyone here had read the book and had any views on it.
http://whitecrowbooks.com/books/page/the...revisited/
Although the book had been diligently researched, I'm afraid I didn't find Adams's proposed solution at all convincing. I was a bit surprised that Tom Ruffles's online review for the SPR was so positive:
https://www.spr.ac.uk/book-review/enigma...paul-adams
Now an even more positive review by Alan Murdie has been published in the SPR Journal.
I wondered whether anyone here had read the book and had any views on it.