(2020-12-28, 03:42 PM)Paul C. Anagnostopoulos Wrote: The evolution of the structure.
~~ Paul
Everyone agrees the structure (the brain) underwent evolution.
Why does evolution allow there to be Something (Consciousness) when there was Nothing (Non-conscious stuff)?
At what point in the evolution is the structure conscious?
'Historically, we may regard materialism as a system of dogma set up to combat orthodox dogma...Accordingly we find that, as ancient orthodoxies disintegrate, materialism more and more gives way to scepticism.'
This is why I think Physicalism is muddled in its explanations and ultimately incoherent for the reason clearly stated by neuroscientist PhD and New Atheist horseman Sam Harris ->
You can't Something from Nothing.
There are a lot of "just so" stories but they all either assume consciousness in some way or just erase it from existence with no rational way to get it back.
'Historically, we may regard materialism as a system of dogma set up to combat orthodox dogma...Accordingly we find that, as ancient orthodoxies disintegrate, materialism more and more gives way to scepticism.'
- Bertrand Russell
Reply
1
The following 1 user Likes Sci's post:1 user Likes Sci's post • Raimo
(2020-12-29, 10:03 AM)malf Wrote: Why are you putting arbitrary constraints on ‘stuff’?
That seems to hamstring even some immaterialists.
Well there is a clear difference between matter and consciousness that materialists are constantly avoiding or glossing over with ill thought out blase generic phrases instead of explaining how it is possible, which is clearly what argument and debate are all about.
Reply
1
The following 1 user Likes Brian's post:1 user Likes Brian's post • Sci
(2020-12-29, 03:28 PM)Brian Wrote: Well there is a clear difference between matter and consciousness that materialists are constantly avoiding or glossing over with ill thought out blase generic phrases instead of explaining how it is possible, which is clearly what argument and debate are all about.
If the difference was clear, the thread needn’t have been started.
Although I admit, it ‘feels’ like there’s a difference.
(2020-12-29, 10:03 AM)malf Wrote: Why are you putting arbitrary constraints on ‘stuff’?
That seems to hamstring even some immaterialists.
And there I was thinking that I'm doing ok following this thread and now you've gone and lost me, malf. What arbitrary constraints are you talking about? As far as I can see, all Sci is asking is "how"? If consciousness evolved in the material (stuff) of the brain, the question needs to be asked - how? He's not saying that matter can't produce consciousness but asking, if that is to be the conclusion, how it does so. I agree with him - it seems to me that there is no explanation of how anywhere to be found. Only an assertion that the material of the brain produces consciousness. When asked how, the answer is usually, because it does!
I do not make any clear distinction between mind and God. God is what mind becomes when it has passed beyond the scale of our comprehension. Freeman Dyson
(2020-12-29, 05:17 PM)malf Wrote: If the difference was clear, the thread needn’t have been started.
Although I admit, it ‘feels’ like there’s a difference.
I think we can agree that people are conscious and that it is reasonable to assume that even the most sophisticated computer isn't. When you see that, surely you see a clear distinction between consciousness and matter? The issue is, what causes the distinction?
![[-]](https://psiencequest.net/forums/images/collapse.png)
