Glowing Auras and ‘Black Money’: The Pentagon’s Mysterious U.F.O. Program

Because there is enough of a consensus in the collective consciousness re: the ET reality that we have co-created this move toward disclosure. It is a sign to the ETs who are interested in first contact that we are crossing the fulcrum point as a civilization in that acceptance. Think the 144,000.

Is that just a feeling and thought process that you have gone through to get to that opinion? I.e how do you 'know'?

Do you have an idea of the intentions of these ET?

Is that just a feeling and thought process that you have gone through to get to that opinion? I.e how do you 'know'?

Do you have an idea of the intentions of these ET?

How does one know how to walk across a room? Or to drink a cup of water? We know it in our bones, it is part of who we are. Like walking and drinking, it requires an effort and a desire to learn, an intention, iow, you cannot be what you are not the vibration of...first.

Let me be clear, there is no extrapolation of information, the above it is as close as possible to being exact, certainly accurate, compilation of quotations from many communicating ETs. Information that comes through over and over again albeit in different phraseology. The different phraseology is due to the need to communicate across a broad spectrum of interested individuals.

"Their" intentions, the ones who communicate, is clear. Assist us in finding out who we really are (the Spirit You) and as we learn more and more about ourselves, we find we learn more and more about them as we are all Source energy existing in different forms.

There are many who do not communicate, mof, most do not. Regardless, the common theme among those who do, in terms of making hard contact with our civilization, is that they have no longer have any restraints on doing so. It is now up to us to show that we are ready, willing and fully capable to meet our interstellar families.

They will come.

There is a new NY Times opinion piece claiming the most parsimonious explanation for UFOs including the recently publicized 2004 Navy case is something along the lines of Jacques Vallee's theory in Passport to Magonia: 

"...our alien encounters, whether real or imaginary, are the same kind of thing as the fairy encounters of the human past — part of an enduring phenomenon whose interpretations shift but whose essentials are consistent, featuring the same abductions and flying crafts and lights and tricks with crops and animals and time and space, the same shape-shifting humanoids and sexual experiments and dangerous gifts and mysterious intentions."

Probably these things should really be separately categorized as several fundamentally different phenomena. I think the ETH is the better hypothesis at least for the subset of UFO-related phenomena involving sightings of physical craft, especially considering the military sightings with multiple expert witnesses (pilots and radar operators), radar detection data and EM emission data. Other types of phenomena like abduction cases, psychic interactions like Vallee's case of "Doctor X", and some crop circles probably have other causes.

Sorry nbtruthman, that link isn't working.

Sorry nbtruthman, that link isn't working.

Flying Saucers and Other Fairy Tales

It should be noted that the image behind Chris Mellon, starting at 15:45, has nothing to do with the "Tic Tac" object reported by Commander Fravor":



According to Metabunk, it's almost certainly a mylar party balloon, originally photographed in Manchester, UK back in 2005:

https://www.metabunk.org/explained-...onnection-with-nimitz-incident-balloon.t9345/

It should be pointed out that the image behind Chris Mellon, starting at 15:45, has nothing to do with the "Tic Tac" object reported by Commander Fravor":



According to Metabunk, it's almost certainly a mylar party balloon, originally photographed in Manchester, UK back in 2005:

https://www.metabunk.org/explained-...onnection-with-nimitz-incident-balloon.t9345/

In that case then, are they not aware of that? Or was it just really sloppy powerpoint stuff that they added on last minute without checking the source? 

I'm still not sure what to make of all this. I keep switching between amazed and then suspicious.

The latest update from Linda Moultoun Howe & George Knapp.




Aside from this video, there seems to be two sides emerging from what I can tell. Those, in the government currently and ex govt folk, along with Tom Delonge and George Knapp, that believe that there are bad aliens. You might add Col John Alexander, Robert Bigelow and others to the list, though I don't think Bigelow ever stated the intention of the ET, just that they are here. Quite clearly in an interview too.

On the other hand, we have the likes of Steven Greer and you could even say, Grant Cameron, who are of the opinion that we aren't to believe what the govt says as it's a DISINFO op and the ET are actually our 'space brothers'. Now for me, this seems to fly in the face of what was seen at Skinwalker Ranch, along with many other alien abduction reports that describe a malevolent presence behind the ET. 

So just what the hell is going on? Are 'both sides' part of a Govt. DISINFO op? Please, correct me if I am wrong on any of the above, as it is just from memory.

In that case then, are they not aware of that? Or was it just really sloppy powerpoint stuff that they added on last minute without checking the source?

Indeed, you'd think they'd have all the details nailed tight for their kickoff presentation, wouldn't you? But this is ufology, where rank speculation routinely passes for fact, and self-important hustlers masquerade as sober researchers. Never mind the inconvenient stuff; the credulous public and media watchdogs won't even notice or care.

One of the two videos recently released also appears to have been debunked, in terms of the "impossibly high acceleration" at which the object moves off the screen:



It turns out the zoom level is doubled as the object leaves the FLIR display screen. You'd think those responsible for analyzing the video before releasing it would have acquainted themselves with the types of screen data displayed before making the unfounded claim of high acceleration.

The video doesn't necessarily invalidate the rest of Cmdr. Dave Fravor's account of the sighting off the coast of San Diego in 2004. However, it does him no favors in demonstrating there was no rapid acceleration as the object left the display screen. By itself, the video could simply be showing a distant aircraft drifting beyond the FLIR's range.

More about this video can be found here:
https://www.metabunk.org/2004-uss-nimitz...age.t9190/

...there seems to be two sides emerging from what I can tell. Those, in the government currently and ex govt folk, along with Tom Delonge and George Knapp, that believe that there are bad aliens. You might add Col John Alexander, Robert Bigelow and others to the list, though I don't think Bigelow ever stated the intention of the ET, just that they are here. Quite clearly in an interview too.

On the other hand, we have the likes of Steven Greer and you could even say, Grant Cameron, who are of the opinion that we aren't to believe what the govt says as it's a DISINFO op and the ET are actually our 'space brothers'. Now for me, this seems to fly in the face of what was seen at Skinwalker Ranch, along with many other alien abduction reports that describe a malevolent presence behind the ET. 

So just what the hell is going on? Are 'both sides' part of a Govt. DISINFO op? Please, correct me if I am wrong on any of the above, as it is just from memory.

Nothing exists in the universe without its polarity. How many one-sided coins have you seen?

This AND That.

Bad, evil, no. Negative energy.
Good, benevolent, no. Positive energy. 

Good news? Positive energy is conductive, aggregative, cumulative and a little of it goes a long way in opposing the negative, segregative and dismissive.