Extrasensory Perception As a Natural, But Not Supernatural Phenomenon

Extrasensory Perception As a Natural, But Not Supernatural Phenomenon

Alexander Ya Temkin

In the present article the results of observations are considered 1) of a person A by another person B and 2) by himself when he is in such a state that he is not able to determine his place in space and time (we call such a state meditation state). It was shown that results of these two kinds of measurements are complementary reciprocally, if to express it in quantum terms. This consideration shows how a person in the meditation state can obtain information on the past and the future, as well as on places being at the large, even big distances (e. g., even in other Galaxy), while from the point of view of the person B he, A, did not change his place in space-time. It is important that among the information obtained A being in the meditation state is the one on somebody thinking, i. e., A in the meditation state is able to the telepathy with other human being in other places of space-time. It is clarified that the telepathic information is trasferred in space and time by human wave de-Broglie, but not by any radiation. It is very important because the propagation velocity of De-Broglie waves is not limited by the light velocity, and can reach any point of the Universe in zero time. It can be important for space researche and communications between space crafts. However, communications using human De-Broglie waves, for example, telepathy, are not reliable (exactly, much less reliable than ordinary electromagnetic communications, e. g., the radio ones): a message may be lost partially or completely, may be distorded. It would be interesting to study this problem in detail. The concept of observer is introduced and studied in the connection with the human thinking. Our approach allows one to define the concept of soul, personality in mathematical terms, and to introduce the notion of states of mind.

Soul and ESP

The concept of mind (Temkin, 1999) includes CRs ("raw materials for thoughts") as well as ACRs (thoughts) as realized CRs. It is evident that when the mind consists only of CRs, the human being is dead. Thus, ACRs (thoughts) form an especially important subset of the mind that merits to be identified with a very important attribute of human beings such that without it life is impossible. To reflect this fact the following definition is introduced:

SOUL-t IS THE SET OF ALL ACRs (THOUGHTS) EXISTING IN THE BRAIN OF A PERSON AT A GIVEN MOMENT t OF TIME.
Without the soul-t a human being is dead because then his mind consists only of CRs. It is clear that the soul-t defined above depends on time. Perhaps a "massive" telepathy is possible when all thoughts of a person (existing at a given moment of time) are accepted by a recipient. In our terms this means that the recipient got the soul-t of the sender. Perhaps, the phenomenon of reincarnation (Rogo 1975; Rhine 1975; Hunt 1964; Parker 1975) can be explained on these grounds, if we take into consideration also "travels" in space and time to include the reincarnation when two participating persons are separated in time and/or space. However, it must remember that soul-t must not be identified with the soul used in the poetry, religion etc. The latter is apparently something characterizing a human being very profoundly, almost independently of the time, a characteristic existing constantly, may be only weakly depending on the time.

I can't even pretend to grasp everything here, but this idea of Psi relying on the "Pilot Wave" seemed interesting...

Extrasensory Perception As a Natural, But Not Supernatural Phenomenon

Alexander Ya Temkin



I can't even pretend to grasp everything here, but this idea of Psi relying on the "Pilot Wave" seemed interesting...

I strongly agree with the author that mind and thinking are natural and that ESP events are just extreme outcomes in a natural process.

The author abstracts the idea of raw materials for thought and that the raw materials build thoughts.  My ideas are all about a methodology to measure the "raw materials" and how they are restructured by thinking and understanding.

Thanks again for your links!!!!!

I strongly agree with the author that mind and thinking are natural and that ESP events are just extreme outcomes in a natural process.

The author abstracts the idea of raw materials for thought and that the raw materials build thoughts.  My ideas are all about a methodology to measure the "raw materials" and how they are restructured by thinking and understanding.

Thanks again for your links!!!!!

Could you go deeper into what these "raw materials" are to you?

Could you go deeper into what these "raw materials" are to you?

Rather than molecules and photons of physics, there are affordances and intentions of psychology, whose inner structure can be observed in light of computation.  The patterns of "willful attraction" can be abstracted; and are computable as process flow models.  (ie information objects open to study)

The modern use of Bayesian analysis is opening the way.  It is truly scary how well big data can mine our affordances and intentions for marketing use, with just a few algorithms !!!!!!!!!!  They can decode preferences to reveal startling personality insights.  There is a lot of penetration into subjective behavior and how it evolves.

http://archivemati.ca/2007/02/05/informa...an-object/

 The Message Has No Meaning without Context

The context of an information object is the environment and conditions in which message contents are created, transmitted and received. As discussed in the previous post, the receiver of a message requires sufficient information about the context of a message to decode and make sense of its contents. The types of contextual information that may be relevant are virtually limitless and may include information about the message creator, their physical location, nationality, mother tongue, mood, body language, tone of voice, intentions, dreams, desires, etc.. The point is that the relevant context is unique to almost every communication instance. Much of the context is implicit in the environment and conditions of the message transmission and the background knowledge and experience of both the sender and receiver.

As a science -- there are lots of "raw material" in biology.  Some gory stuff from bodies of living things, but most of life is about the "substance" of the meanings involved with functional, logical and creative behavior.  Bio experiences are limited to the meanings in actual environments and we (all living things) evolved to find those things we want.

We all have ESP about what we like.  We just know.