(2018-01-14, 02:38 PM)Valmar Wrote: I posted this here because I wasn't entirely sure where else to place it. Feel free to move it to the more appropriate forum.
But that didn't address a single point from the (lengthy) original article. I think that's literally true, but if not, it's very, very close to a literal truth. Not one point.
Reply
1
The following 1 user Likes Laird's post:1 user Likes Laird's post • Valmar
Nope, don't feel like reading the article and addressing all the points. Sometimes you gotta filter your reading by considering the source.
The RationalWiki article has references. I especially like this:
"(It should be added that, in a signed letter published in David Duke's National Association of White People newsletter, he stated that “reverse racial discrimination was clearly part of the decision,” so even according to himself it cannot have been solely because of his religious beliefs.[12])"
~~ Paul
If the existence of a thing is indistinguishable from its nonexistence, we say that thing does not exist. ---Yahzi
(2018-01-17, 04:11 PM)Paul C. Anagnostopoulos Wrote: Nope, don't feel like reading the article and addressing all the points. Sometimes you gotta filter your reading by considering the source.
The RationalWiki article has references. I especially like this:
"(It should be added that, in a signed letter published in David Duke's National Association of White People newsletter, he stated that “reverse racial discrimination was clearly part of the decision,” so even according to himself it cannot have been solely because of his religious beliefs.[12])"
~~ Paul
Besides, if any of his points are valid, surely an uncontroversial proponent of them could be referenced instead.