6.37 sigma replication of Dean Radin's double slit consciousness experiments

I'm honestly curious about something but the thread is 33 pages....so can anyone let me know if they contacted the researchers in question w/ complaints?

If not Radin has sometimes replied to me in the past, I could try asking him?

I've had some email correspondence with Gabriel Guerrer about the work. Obviously he recognised the problem with the original statistical analysis, and did further experiments to be analysed using pre-registered statistical hypotheses.

I've had some email correspondence with Gabriel Guerrer about the work. Obviously he recognised the problem with the original statistical analysis, and did further experiments to be analysed using pre-registered statistical hypotheses.

If you're referring to Radin's intitial work then do you remember stating this in post 327?

Just for the record, I checked, and Guerrer says no such thing.

[color] I did not state he said outright Radin is mistaken to conclude victory. Well the bold text confirms what I stated about Guerrer's opinion. You should read that conclusion again. A keyword is "favors" that means strongly suggests, but the results could be do to other variables.[/color]

 There's a larger problem looming that's seemingly never acknowledged. That problem is we could never trust the results of any quantum experiment if the whims of the experimenter(s) are involved.

Steve

No, when I say Guerrer recognised the problem with the original analysis, I mean with his (Guerrer's) original analysis. The problem I had just been talking about yesterday. 

You claimed:
"I read the conclusion given by Gabriel. He does conclude Radin jumped the gun."

I checked, and Guerrer doesn't say any such thing about Radin's work.

Steve

No, when I say Guerrer recognised the problem with the original analysis, I mean with his (Guerrer's) original analysis. The problem I had just been talking about yesterday. 

You claimed:
"I read the conclusion given by Gabriel. He does conclude Radin jumped the gun."

I checked, and Guerrer doesn't say any such thing about Radin's work.

I give up. You win.

I give up. You win.

Really, Steve, if you had said "I conclude on the basis of Guerrer's results that Radin jumped the gun", then I might well have agreed with you. But "He [Guerrer] does conclude that Radin jumped the gun" means something quite different. He didn't say that.