(2017-09-19, 02:56 PM)Roberta Wrote: Source that denture man was undergoing CPR when he received some sensory data ? We also lack an explanation of how he'd be able to recall in such detail and have such a high level of consciousness in such a state. 'Some awareness' is a world away from the detail he called and the type of experience he had.http://netwerknde.nl/wp-content/uploads/...ureman.pdf
You were at full waking consciousness and purposefully trying to see if you could hear (also how can you guarantee the acoustics, background noise etc were the same? You can't). You wouldn't accept this level of person research in the proponent direction, so why should we accept the test of yours having any baring on Anita's case? And remember her brain was in an impaired state at the time.
Source for your claim about Santori? Her telling a patient everything then finding the statements read back to her remarkable seems very sloppy to me, would like a credible source that that actually happened. And what statement came from what third-hand report? More details please.
https://www.amazon.com/Near-Death-Experi...077345103X
http://iands.es/bibliografia/Sartori_Fenwick.pdf
The advantage of the hidden target is that we get to forego these kinds of arguments, where proponents want to restrict our sensory capacity and skeptics don't. None of the cases jkmac mentioned would be remarkable with some sensory function, whereas spotting a hidden target would be remarkable even with full sensory function.
Linda