(2017-09-17, 10:05 AM)Max_B Wrote: But Chris, it's so wide open... what is such a wide open study supposed to tell us...?
Is it any wonder people don't take the study seriously, and don't take much time to bother understanding it before dismissing the experiment, when researchers don't bother to improve their experiment... Selecting from an apparently unlimited range of events with flexible timescales which have already happened, and won't say how they make the selection. Who take no steps to shield their nose-based RNG devices, or improve their devices power supply quality. Who don't run controls with non XORed data to find correlations. It's typical of the Radin/ION's junk experiments I've mentioned elsewhere.
Radin/ION's 'junk experiments' - where the authors showed they dealt with your concerns about said experiments, yet you're still claiming they're junk?