Very interesting. I watched the video(s) but only skimmed the paper. A minor note:
This is the full video from which the earlier clip was taken.
It is especially interesting in light of the ongoing forum debate over "nuts-and-bolts" UFOs, aka the Extraterrestrial Hypothesis (ETH), for several reasons:
Firstly, (and this is from memory, so I might get some of the minor details wrong) Kevin asserts that if a craft from a close-ish star could be sped up to close to the speed of light, although the journey from the perspective of the planet from which it left would take hundreds of thousands of years, from the perspective of the craft it would take only a day or so. If he's right (I'm not familiar enough with relativity theory to know), then, though the problem of how to obtain enough power to accelerate the craft to that speed remains, the problem of the time taken to get here is solved - at least, assuming that back-and-forth travel is not required, since hundreds of thousands of years would have elapsed on the home planet by the time the travellers returned, even though only a couple of days would have elapsed from the travellers' perspective.
Secondly, he describes how certain observations of (electro)magnetic fields generated by UFOs accurately predict the observed probability of car engines restarting after having been stopped in the presence of the UFO. This suggests a physical presence at least as indicated by the generation of an (electro)magnetic field.
Finally, his calculations of the observed acceleration of certain UFOs combined with their estimated weight suggests that they do have access to huge amounts of power, such that although we don't know what that power source is, it could very well be sufficient to accelerate craft to near enough the speed of light for the "day trip" referenced earlier to be possible.
There might be others that I've missed, but that was definitely an eye-opening presentation.
(2024-05-20, 05:21 PM)nbtruthman Wrote: Another video
This is the full video from which the earlier clip was taken.
It is especially interesting in light of the ongoing forum debate over "nuts-and-bolts" UFOs, aka the Extraterrestrial Hypothesis (ETH), for several reasons:
Firstly, (and this is from memory, so I might get some of the minor details wrong) Kevin asserts that if a craft from a close-ish star could be sped up to close to the speed of light, although the journey from the perspective of the planet from which it left would take hundreds of thousands of years, from the perspective of the craft it would take only a day or so. If he's right (I'm not familiar enough with relativity theory to know), then, though the problem of how to obtain enough power to accelerate the craft to that speed remains, the problem of the time taken to get here is solved - at least, assuming that back-and-forth travel is not required, since hundreds of thousands of years would have elapsed on the home planet by the time the travellers returned, even though only a couple of days would have elapsed from the travellers' perspective.
Secondly, he describes how certain observations of (electro)magnetic fields generated by UFOs accurately predict the observed probability of car engines restarting after having been stopped in the presence of the UFO. This suggests a physical presence at least as indicated by the generation of an (electro)magnetic field.
Finally, his calculations of the observed acceleration of certain UFOs combined with their estimated weight suggests that they do have access to huge amounts of power, such that although we don't know what that power source is, it could very well be sufficient to accelerate craft to near enough the speed of light for the "day trip" referenced earlier to be possible.
There might be others that I've missed, but that was definitely an eye-opening presentation.
![[-]](https://psiencequest.net/forums/images/collapse.png)