(2017-09-07, 10:51 AM)chuck Wrote: Without know exactly what Max_B said about Radin, it is going to be hard to make a judgement. I didn't see the original post. In what way was the claim false?
I'm just wondering, because if it was clearly false, then I assume Max_B would have retracted it.
In two posts, Max_B imputed that Dean Radin deliberately engaged in fraudulent research practices so as to produce positive results which would generate funds for IONS. It was not a flat-out claim, but it did impute that.
Just a FYI: I'm about to run out of laptop battery charge, and won't be able to get to a power point for a few hours, so will have to resume this discussion later.