"Why I am no longer a skeptic"

He was never a true skeptic. His piece was debunked here:

https://debunkingdenialism.com/2013/04/2...onvincing/

Sorry- was not going to respond to you in any way but I just can't help myself here. This is too important to me and maybe others...

Let me understand this: there is a litmus test for skeptics?

So it's not about the merits of a particular thing, where you have particular opinions or interpretation of the data that you wish to discuss? It's not about being skeptical of a particular thing? It's really about loyalty to a cause? So you need to support a whole list of stuff, and deny a whole list of others to be a "true skeptic"?

BTW- I would list those things here (like a thing that is like 811 but you add 100 to it) but afraid it will cause WAY too much off-topic and probably banned discussion. 

I gotta tell you: I'm very happy (and surprised) that you so willingly expose your true motivation. It is helpful for me and others to understand whether, and how to respond.