(2017-12-30, 01:16 AM)Chris Wrote: Yes, it still works for me. But here's a tinyurl link to the same page:
https://tinyurl.com/ybeewywv
Now it worked. Thanks
Edit: Here is a site with more info.>> http://www.paleo.cc/paluxy/hammer.htm
It seem that the claim of it being 400 million years old was an analysis done on the rock by some creationist groups. They refuse to have it tested by anyone else, and now keep it in a creationist museum.
Conclusion is:
Quote:As with all extraordinary claims, the burden of proof is on those making the claims, not on those questioning them. Despite some creationist assertions that the hammer is a dramatic pre-Flood relic, no clear evidence linking the hammer to any ancient formation has been presented. Moreover, the hammer's artistic style and the condition of the handle suggest a historically recent age. It may well have been dropped by a local worker within the last few hundred years, after which dissolved sediment hardened into a concretion around it. Unless Baugh or others can provide rigorous evidence that the hammer was once naturally situated in a pre-Quaternary stratum, it remains merely a curiosity, not a reliable out-of-place artifact.