The monumental 1968 Minot ND USA B-52 airborne and ground UFO encounter

4 Replies, 72 Views

I thought I would summarize this classic UFO case, which demonstrates that at least some UFOs are clearly and unequivocally "somebody else's hardware". It is one of the best encounters ever, and it needs to be covered here since it doesn't seem to have been discussed so far. I invite the skeptics to come up with a plausible "normal" explanation. This summary is lengthy because the sighting was complicated with an unprecedentally large amount of excellent data.

This was an extraordinary radar and air-visual UFO and ground observer encounter witnessed by the pilot and radar operator of a B52H bomber (and several other military witnesses on the ground) near Minot AFB in North Dakota USA on 24 October 1968. We have a very valuable exhaustive 145-page detailed scientific analysis of the case written by Claude Poher, Ph.D. and released in Aug. 2005, which is at https://www.academia.edu/105405731/Analy...view-paper.

This study shows unequivocably that the extensive radar data and witness observations completely correlate and are internally and externally consistent with there having been an actual object with flight characteristics totally impossible for any aircraft.

This case was never investigated properly until many years later by Poher. Project Blue Book was operating at the time of the event but as would be expected they basically and ridiculously wrote it off as mistaken observations of exceedingly rare ball lightning and the star Vega, despite all the evidence to the contrary and the interest of several Strategic Air Command generals including 15th Air Force's Major General Nichols. They were especially concerned because there was apparent damage to the Minuteman missile site there, and the disruption of B-52 radio transmissions indicated we had a threat to a primary nuclear offense system. 

Witnesses at Minot Air Force Base, North Dakota, which included security personnel at the installation’s ICBM launch complex, maintenance staff, and the crew aboard the airborne B-52H, all participated in one of the most significant UFO incidents ever to have occurred.

From the Hynek UFO report:

Quote:"USAF Minot AFB ground radar tracked an unidentified object correlated with orange glow and radioed it to the attention of the USAF crew of B-52H bomber (call sign JAG 31) on a 290° heading at 2,000 ft as a UFO target at 1 o'clock position to the NW at 24 miles, then 15 miles at 3:35 a.m. At 3:52 a.m., Minot radioed the B-52H that base weather radar was also tracking target now at 1 o'clock position and 3 miles from the B-52H. At 3:58 Minot requested IFF transponder identification from the B-52H and the B-52H radio transmitter failed for 4 mins. B-52H crew saw and radar tracked bright red-orange object [?] at 9 o'clock position at 35 miles then 1.25-1.5 miles, traveling at 3,000 mph."

At one point of this complex sighting, the object was reported to land on the ground, where numerous observers actually observed it. Also occuring during this incident was apparent damage to a local Minuteman missile site complex.

Some key points of many extracted from the original unclassified message describing the sighting, at https://minotb52ufo.com/pdf/Basic_Reporting_Data.pdf :

Quote:"Description of the object(s): Shape was described by visual sighting as "just about round, a little oblong if anything". The shape on the airborne B52 radar scope was very sharp and irregular and at times rectangular. Visual sighting compared the object size to be equal to the sun, very large, too big for an aircraft. Radar sighting describes the size on the scope to be larger than that of a KC-135 tanker during aerial refueling. Color was a very bright red orange most of the time.

When viewed from above by the B-52 crew, the object had a faintly white oblong halo on one side with an orange spot on the other side, and the body appeared to be a bright white light.
When almost overhead, a low muffled jet engine sound was heard. This occured twice during the sightings. The ability to hover and to change direction and speed abruptly was also observed."

The following are just a few scattered quotes from the 145 page detailed Poher analysis which show its depth and exhaustiveness, and demonstrate that this is one of the best or perhaps the very best UFO sighting ever, with documented radar display images of the object, which are entirely and exactly consistent with the reports of the eyewitnesses. Aircraft radarscope photos have been preserved which unequivocally show the UFO. They are first-generation photographic prints from the original 1968 film-negatives. Calculations show that the UFO was highly supersonic during its entire observed flight, which should have produced a loud sonic boom time and again, though none was reported, as is generally the case with other reported supersonic UFOs. Nevertheless, these speeds are clearly beyond all aeronautical developments in 1968. It is especially interesting that an ionized cloud surrounded the UFO, as verified by visual observations and photogrammetric analysis of the radarscope photos.

Quote:"...at the 1.75 nm range ring the sweeping speed of the beam would be in the order of 24435 km / h (15190 mph). We should also consider the size of the target that was identified by the radar beam. According to the radar operator, the size of the echo was larger than a KC-135 Stratotanker (41 x 39 meters) and therefore the target could not have been an aircraft. For example, the size of the radar echo in Figure 16 measures in the order of 280 x 140 meters, compared to the size of the B-52 measuring 48 x 56 meters.
Taken together, we know of no human device this size that can fly at the measured speed. In most of the photos the intensity of the echo is considerable, and nearly at the same level as the echo of the ground below the B-52. The UFO echo also contains some photometric structure (i.e., limb to center radar albedo
increase), which further confirms that this echo could not have been an artifact."
.................................
"To underscore the importance of (the radarscope photographs), all successive echoes are inside the central zone referred to as the altitude hole, and therefore can only correspond to airborne targets. In addition, the B-52 speed was on average 460 km / h (285 mph), so that the radar target would have to maintain the same velocity in order to remain in the altitude hole (and high-acceleration when it changed position)."
.................................
...within 3 seconds, the echo made an abrupt turn and moved from the aft right to the left of the B-52, traveling 2.09 nm (3.9 km) at an apparent speed of 4600
km/h (2858 mph). The largest dimension of the echo is oriented approximately at right angles to the heading of the B-52.
.................................
...calculations show that the UFO was supersonic during all of its observed flight, which should have produced a loud sonic boom time and again, though none was reported, as is generally the case with other reported supersonic UFOs. Nevertheless, these speeds are clearly beyond all aeronautical developments in 1968.
.................................
The echo that recurs roughly one nautical mile to the left of the B-52 at ~40 degrees, is the only echo that consistently appears in the same place in eight of the photographs. This location of the UFO is also consistent with the documentary evidence, and the testimonies of the B-52 Navigator and Co-pilot."
(This post was last modified: 2024-05-07, 04:13 PM by nbtruthman. Edited 7 times in total.)
[-] The following 2 users Like nbtruthman's post:
  • Typoz, Laird
I don't see why this is definitely someone else's hardware?

For myself, I think it does show something of interest but I don't know if one can say it's definitely a craft made on another planet/dimension and sent here...
'Historically, we may regard materialism as a system of dogma set up to combat orthodox dogma...Accordingly we find that, as ancient orthodoxies disintegrate, materialism more and more gives way to scepticism.'

- Bertrand Russell


[-] The following 3 users Like Sciborg_S_Patel's post:
  • Typoz, sbu, Brian
Final Project Blue Book report

Quote:TDPT (UFO) 13 NOV 1968
UFO Observation, 24 October 1968

Special Security Office (SAC)
Final Project Blue Book report

Scan of the original document.

1. Reference SSO message 071540Z, with regards to evaluations of UFO reports from Minot AFB. The following conclusions have been reached after a thorough study of the data submitted to the Foreign Technology Division. The ground visual sightings appear to be of the star Sirius and the B-52 which was flying in the area. The B-52 radar contact and the temporary loss of UHF transmission could be attributed to a plasma similar to ball lightning. The air visual from the B-52 could be the star Vega which was on the horizon at the time, or it could be a light on the ground, or possibly a plasma. The physical violation of the lock of OSCAR 7 does not seem to be related to UFOs in any way.

2. No further investigation by the Foreign Technology Division is contemplated. For your information we are attaching a copy of the sequence of events, a resume of the sightings and a discussion of the background information.

FOR THE COMMANDER

HECTOR QUINTANILLA, Jr., Lt Colonel, USAF Chief,
Aerial Phenomena Branch,
Aerospace Technologies Division,
Production Directorate.
[Image: document-1272-large.jpg]
https://minotb52ufo.com/investigation/se...6.php#bbe2

Full investigation
https://minotb52ufo.com/investigation.php

Investigation's conclusion: https://minotb52ufo.com/investigation/section-6.php

Quote:The 24 October 1968 Minot AFB case provides a unique opportunity to examine official attitudes and Air Force policy regarding the UFO phenomenon. In this case, Quintanilla’s conclusions were typical of the methods, and faux science the Air Force employed to eliminate unidentified reports, and reassure the public of the lack of evidence behind UFOs. For over two decades the policy was successful, and continues to reinforce a prohibition on taking UFOs seriously. This is particularly true in authoritative public sectors where the publication of erroneous and more often misleading scientific data, sustained by the repetition of false narratives, has effectively established a culturally induced ignorance or doubt.  What has always been lacking and remains so after more than 60 years is an objective, systematic scientific study of the UFO phenomenon — in a search for the truth.
[-] The following 1 user Likes Brian's post:
  • Typoz
(2024-05-07, 06:57 PM)Sciborg_S_Patel Wrote: I don't see why this is definitely someone else's hardware?

For myself, I think it does show something of interest but I don't know if one can say it's definitely a craft made on another planet/dimension and sent here...

To repeat part of the quote of the extensive analysis that I used,  

"...According to the radar operator, the size of the echo was larger than a KC-135 Stratotanker (41 x 39 meters) and therefore the target could not have been an aircraft. For example, the size of the radar echo in Figure 16 measures in the order of 280 x 140 meters, compared to the size of the B-52 measuring 48 x 56 meters.
Taken together, we know of no human device this size that can fly at the measured speed. In most of the photos the intensity of the echo is considerable, and nearly at the same level as the echo of the ground below the B-52. The UFO echo also contains some photometric structure (i.e., limb to center radar albedo
increase), which further confirms that this echo could not have been an artifact."
 
Overall, the analysis shows that the observations were apparently of an actual structured physical object (or at least a large something that reflected radar beams, emitted bright lights, made a low level sound, and adversely affected radar and communication systems), and with flight characteristics very far beyond anything in our technology. Certainly ETI from another star system is only one possible explanation, with others being notions like visitation by some sort of interdimensional or parallel world/universe intelligence, or other really far-out concepts, but something of that order is certainly necessary.
(This post was last modified: 2024-05-07, 09:47 PM by nbtruthman. Edited 2 times in total.)
[-] The following 3 users Like nbtruthman's post:
  • Typoz, Sciborg_S_Patel, Laird
(2024-05-07, 09:23 PM)nbtruthman Wrote: Overall, the analysis shows that the observations were apparently of an actual structured physical object (or at least a large something that reflected radar beams, emitted bright lights, made a low level sound, and adversely affected radar and communication systems), and with flight characteristics very far beyond anything in our technology. Certainly ETI from another star system is only one possible explanation, with others being notions like visitation by some sort of interdimensional or parallel world/universe intelligence, or other really far-out concepts, but something of that order is certainly necessary.

Right, *something* was observed. I agree that if accept the source as credible then it was an anomaly, but I am just not convinced it's an actual alien craft.
'Historically, we may regard materialism as a system of dogma set up to combat orthodox dogma...Accordingly we find that, as ancient orthodoxies disintegrate, materialism more and more gives way to scepticism.'

- Bertrand Russell


[-] The following 2 users Like Sciborg_S_Patel's post:
  • Typoz, sbu

  • View a Printable Version
Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)