@Valmar, the only anomalous entries I see there are with reference to "common.js". This is not a file provided by our forum software. Perhaps it is provided by a Firefox plugin. This leads me to wonder whether the incorrect styling for likes that you're seeing has something to do with a Firefox plugin. Perhaps you could try temporarily disabling all of your plugins and seeing whether the problem is still present.
Roundo: our new mobile-friendly theme, proposed to be set as default
131 Replies, 8176 Views
(2023-02-14, 03:50 AM)Laird Wrote: @Valmar, the only anomalous entries I see there are with reference to "common.js". This is not a file provided by our forum software. Perhaps it is provided by a Firefox plugin. This leads me to wonder whether the incorrect styling for likes that you're seeing has something to do with a Firefox plugin. Perhaps you could try temporarily disabling all of your plugins and seeing whether the problem is still present. Will do.
“Everything that irritates us about others can lead us to an understanding of ourselves.”
~ Carl Jung
Hmmmmm. No difference, even in Nightly's Troubleshoot Mode where all themes, extensions and customizations are disabled.
“Everything that irritates us about others can lead us to an understanding of ourselves.”
~ Carl Jung (2023-02-14, 03:50 AM)Laird Wrote: @Valmar, the only anomalous entries I see there are with reference to "common.js". This is not a file provided by our forum software. Perhaps it is provided by a Firefox plugin. This leads me to wonder whether the incorrect styling for likes that you're seeing has something to do with a Firefox plugin. Perhaps you could try temporarily disabling all of your plugins and seeing whether the problem is still present. What browser do you use, may I ask? There are a number of websites that only test with Chrome nowadays, sadly, and Google is quite happy to break standards, leading to some websites being broken on Firefox and other non-Chrome-based web browsers.
“Everything that irritates us about others can lead us to an understanding of ourselves.”
~ Carl Jung (2023-02-14, 08:54 AM)Valmar Wrote: What browser do you use, may I ask? There are a number of websites that only test with Chrome nowadays, sadly, and Google is quite happy to break standards, leading to some websites being broken on Firefox and other non-Chrome-based web browsers. The nightly builds of Firefox don’t have the stability of the release channel? I use Firefox for Windows on the release channel, and don’t see the same CSS problem for the likes section underneath posts.
We shall not cease from exploration
And the end of all our exploring Will be to arrive where we started And know the place for the first time. (2023-02-14, 10:48 AM)Max_B Wrote: The nightly builds of Firefox don’t have the stability of the release channel? I use Firefox for Windows on the release channel, and don’t see the same CSS problem for the likes section underneath posts. Nightly builds have rapid daily releases. It's like being on a constant Alpha. On that note... lemme try with stable Firefox.
“Everything that irritates us about others can lead us to an understanding of ourselves.”
~ Carl Jung
This post has been deleted.
Looks normal on Firefox stable and a clean Firefox Nightly profile. So, probably just the quirks of an old profile...
“Everything that irritates us about others can lead us to an understanding of ourselves.”
~ Carl Jung (2023-02-14, 01:09 AM)Laird Wrote: I'd ignored the editor until now but it should be darkened. I'll look into how best to do that at some point. Now done. You might need to force-refresh the page to get the updated styling to apply. Please let me know of any glitches and less-than-ideal styling. (2023-02-14, 08:54 AM)Valmar Wrote: What browser do you use, may I ask? The standard version of Firefox as supplied by the standard Fedora Linux package manager using its standard repositories. (2023-02-14, 10:57 AM)Valmar Wrote: Looks normal on Firefox stable and a clean Firefox Nightly profile. So, probably just the quirks of an old profile... Probably there's no need for further debugging then. |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)