Other Topics...

Don’t flatter yourself dear. I couldn’t give a shit about you not being there.

Excellent. Then please leave me the f**k alone. 

Linda

You're really off base on this one, Linda. I chose to respond to you because you used the words "I don't care" to a query from another member. The only other person who mass-deleted was Chris, the topic was brought up to him in PM by Laird, and he has now left the forum definitively.

That will teach me to respond to a troll, then, which to be fair is definitely a lesson I need to learn.

Linda

[Laird]

Sorry to hear about Chris's decision

I think you speak with most of us with that. Certainly for me and the rest of the admin team.

[Ninshub]

Yes. Chris will be missed severely for all of his contributions.

[Laird]

As we recognize, nbtruthman was simply trolling.

In fairness to nbtruthman, it wasn't "we" who "recognised" that, but only one person (me) who suggested that he was "kind of" trolling. It's "kind of" a judgement call as to where the boundary lies between legitimately calling out nonsense from "skeptics" and trolling "skeptics", and my judgement call was only a fuzzy one.

Also, I think it needs to be pointed out that in your opening reply - now deleted - in that thread you wrote:

I am personally unable to take comfort from mere wishful thinking

which is... kind of... trollish in itself...

The way I saw "nothing but the truth man?" 's post was that it was some tasty bait that may (naturally) not have been to their taste?
Bait which they (maybe) didn't care to take up. Presumably because either there aren't enough sceptics actually active on the forum or secondly, they know they're onto a loser trying to argue that existing as a biological robot is a sufficient raison d'etre. 

Not trolling, though.