Dinosaur Extinction: The Nastiest Feud in Science?

1 Replies, 820 Views

Dinosaur Extinction: The Nastiest Feud in Science by Bianca Bosker

Quote:The impact theory provided an elegant solution to a prehistoric puzzle, and its steady march from hypothesis to fact offered a heartwarming story about the integrity of the scientific method. “This is nearly as close to a certainty as one can get in science,” a planetary-science professor told Time magazine in an article on the crater’s discovery. In the years since, impacters say they have come even closer to total certainty. “I would argue that the hypothesis has reached the level of the evolution hypothesis,” says Sean Gulick, a research professor at the University of Texas at Austin who studies the Chicxulub crater. “We have it nailed down, the case is closed,” Buck Sharpton, a geologist and scientist emeritus at the Lunar and Planetary Institute, has said.

But Keller doesn’t buy any of it. “It’s like a fairy tale: ‘Big rock from sky hits the dinosaurs, and boom they go.’ And it has all the aspects of a really nice story,” she said. “It’s just not true.”

While the majority of her peers embraced the Chicxulub asteroid as the cause of the extinction, Keller remained a maligned and, until recently, lonely voice contesting it. She argues that the mass extinction was caused not by a wrong-place-wrong-time asteroid collision but by a series of colossal volcanic eruptions in a part of western India known as the Deccan Traps—a theory that was first proposed in 1978 and then abandoned by all but a small number of scientists. Her research, undertaken with specialists around the world and featured in leading scientific journals, has forced other scientists to take a second look at their data. “Gerta uncovered many things through the years that just don’t sit with the nice, simple impact story that Alvarez put together,” Andrew Kerr, a geochemist at Cardiff University, told me. “She’s made people think about a previously near-uniformly accepted model.”
'Historically, we may regard materialism as a system of dogma set up to combat orthodox dogma...Accordingly we find that, as ancient orthodoxies disintegrate, materialism more and more gives way to scepticism.'

- Bertrand Russell

[-] The following 6 users Like Sciborg_S_Patel's post:
  • nbtruthman, Typoz, Valmar, Michael Larkin, Ninshub, Doug
I thought the “consensus” view is that it's not simply the Chicxulub impact. The demise of the dinosaurs appears to have come about from both disasters happening in part simultaneously. The Deccan Traps eruption came first and pushed the saurians into a considerable decline. Then the giant asteroid impact delivered the final coup de grace. As far as I can tell absolutely no dinosaurian fossils have been found above the impact layer. If that is true it closes the case. If that is not true I would like to see the papers documenting the fossil finds. 
[-] The following 2 users Like nbtruthman's post:
  • Sciborg_S_Patel, Ninshub

  • View a Printable Version
Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)