Debunk my experience

The article in The Independent references this study:

Terminal spreading depolarization and electrical silence in death of human cerebral cortex

First published: 13 January 2018

That's right, Typoz. So it's the same type of study but done by two different groups ? One group has already withdrawn their conclusions. Will this group withdraw theirs ? It doesn't have anything to do with consciousness or near death experience anyway, it's just another desperate attempt by sceptics (who joyfully link to the study) to come up with something...anything...??

I've tried to quote everything out of the book which is at all relevant, especially because most people unfortunately are not able to access the book...

...If you have any questions about what's in the book, I can type out excerpts.

Linda

Frankly, without having the full transcripts of Sartori's interviews with these patients, I can't tell whether or not what's been posted is all that's relevant. (I don't mean that as an insinuation or accusation; I literally don't know what else is in the interviews, and one could have an honest disagreement on what constitutes relevancy.)

Frankly, without having the full transcripts of Sartori's interviews with these patients, I can't tell whether or not what's been posted is all that's relevant. (I don't mean that as an insinuation or accusation; I literally don't know what else is in the interviews, and one could have an honest disagreement on what constitutes relevancy.)

I agree. There are over 150 pages of transcripts, and even though I have read them through several times, if I have a specific question in mind, I still need to read them again when I look specifically for any references that may be relevant. And what is relevant to me and Penny (specific references) may not be to another (e.g. metaphorical references).


So I should say, I have posted all explicit and literal references to the hidden targets. But there is a wealth of possibility for other relevant experiences, even if you just look for implicit references. And there are good arguments (which I agree with) that psi-related events are implicit, rather than explicit. However, when it comes to the kinds of experiences where "neuroscience explanations fall apart" (which is the question/statement I was addressing when I brought up this research), explicit and literal references will do the trick. 

Linda