(Yesterday, 07:09 PM)Bill37 Wrote: Can we stop taking this seriously now ?
Taking what seriously? The accounts on NDERF?
That some of them are posted by vandals doesn't mean that all of them are.
(Yesterday, 07:09 PM)Bill37 Wrote: I find myself continuing to make excuses and shuffle my thoughts to justify the latest b.s.
You don't have to justify B.S.
Again, that there is B.S. doesn't mean it's all B.S.
(Yesterday, 07:09 PM)Bill37 Wrote: Should I believe in a flat earth at this point to? How it’s starting to feel …
All that shows is that you can't always trust your feelings.
(Yesterday, 07:09 PM)Bill37 Wrote: some of the latest research on NDE’s, cardiac arrest, surges of activity , eeg still Being present , etc etc etc
Bill, even the worst-case scenario (for those of us who acknowledge the reality of NDEs) in which the brain is active (to some degree) during NDEs still doesn't explain veridical NDEs. An active brain alone can't accurately perceive details that are beyond the scope of its physical sensory organs, even if those sensory organs are actively perceiving, which, in many (most? all?) of these cases, they aren't.
Now, you could choose to be a denialist like @sbu (among a host of others) and just wave all the evidence for veridical NDEs away - with, let's be clear, absolutely no sound justification: "anecdotes don't count and nor do the NDEs in prospective studies" is the real B.S. here - because it's inconvenient to your worldview, but do you really want to be a denialist?
![[-]](https://psiencequest.net/forums/images/collapse.png)