Darwin Unhinged: The Bugs in Evolution

1535 Replies, 185819 Views

(2020-08-29, 05:26 AM)Sciborg_S_Patel Wrote: All that said, I don't think Intelligent Design necessarily shows a creator of our world's biological life, let alone a Creator. It does seem to suggest interventions by some entities, possibly immaterial and possibly aliens of a more "nuts & bolts" kind.

How does an immaterial entity fail to qualify as a creator? I'm not supporting nor opposing these things, just not sure of the distinction (other than the use of upper-case characters).
[-] The following 3 users Like Typoz's post:
  • Larry, Brian, Sciborg_S_Patel
(2020-08-29, 05:26 PM)Typoz Wrote: How does an immaterial entity fail to qualify as a creator? I'm not supporting nor opposing these things, just not sure of the distinction (other than the use of upper-case characters).

I just mean the immaterial entities would be shown to have influenced life's progress through evolutionary stages, not actually created life on Earth.
'Historically, we may regard materialism as a system of dogma set up to combat orthodox dogma...Accordingly we find that, as ancient orthodoxies disintegrate, materialism more and more gives way to scepticism.'

- Bertrand Russell


[-] The following 3 users Like Sciborg_S_Patel's post:
  • Brian, stephenw, Typoz
(2020-08-27, 10:44 AM)malf Wrote: Well, clearly we need to see a creator/designer model and see if it’s falsifiable then?
Mental processes enabled living things to design their own phenotype and genomes.
[-] The following 1 user Likes stephenw's post:
  • Sciborg_S_Patel
(2020-08-29, 05:26 PM)Typoz Wrote: How does an immaterial entity fail to qualify as a creator? I'm not supporting nor opposing these things, just not sure of the distinction (other than the use of upper-case characters).

It would depend on your definition of an immaterial entity. If you saw your grandmothers ghost you would probably not refer to her a/the creator
[-] The following 2 users Like Larry's post:
  • Typoz, Sciborg_S_Patel
(2020-09-02, 06:29 PM)Larry Wrote: It would depend on your definition of an immaterial entity. If you saw your grandmothers ghost you would probably not refer to her a/the creator

That's a fair comment. Though in the original context it was Sciborg's suggestion of some intervention in the development of life on Earth. That is to say, it was a reference to an entity/some entities involved or participating in some way in directing that process.
(This post was last modified: 2020-09-02, 07:37 PM by Typoz.)
[-] The following 1 user Likes Typoz's post:
  • Sciborg_S_Patel
Yeah I would say ID is quite interesting, though I admittedly don't follow it too closely since I am already leaning toward the idea of spirits intervening in "material processes"...of course the word "spirit" itself invites questions.

The motivation that drives a good bit of the ID scholarship/funding seems to be trying to show there's a God by which they mean a conscious Ground of All Being. That I think is very very flawed thinking on their part b/c what ID purports to show is a weighting of mutation dice, and if nothing else [probability manipulation] is exactly what modern day magicians claim to do via some internal power and/or working with spirits.

Arguably even fine-tuning isn't absolute proof of big-G God but at the least you're talking about the fundamental structures of the Universe for some of that...
'Historically, we may regard materialism as a system of dogma set up to combat orthodox dogma...Accordingly we find that, as ancient orthodoxies disintegrate, materialism more and more gives way to scepticism.'

- Bertrand Russell


(This post was last modified: 2020-09-02, 08:12 PM by Sciborg_S_Patel.)
(2020-09-02, 08:03 PM)Sciborg_S_Patel Wrote: Yeah I would say ID is quite interesting, though I admittedly don't follow it too closely since I am already leaning toward the idea of spirits intervening in "material processes"...of course the word "spirit" itself invites questions.

The motivation that drives a good bit of the ID scholarship/funding seems to be trying to show there's a God by which they mean a conscious Ground of All Being. That I think is very very flawed thinking on their part b/c what ID purports to show is a weighting of mutation dice, and if nothing else [probability manipulation] is exactly what modern day magicians claim to do via some internal power and/or working with spirits.

Arguably even fine-tuning isn't absolute proof of big-G God but at the least you're talking about the fundamental structures of the Universe for some of that...

There is also a corollary, in that the mainstream scientific lines of thought tend to lead to an extreme in not really having an openness towards acknowledging some role for a conscious creative force, even within ourselves. It seems an unfortunate consequence of taking that path is an aloofness towards such things as the warmth of human affection, discarding big-g God has led to rejecting the obvious. It's a kind of fragmented, broken pattern of thought which reduces the ability to think clearly. Which is ironic really.
[-] The following 5 users Like Typoz's post:
  • Brian, stephenw, Larry, Kamarling, Sciborg_S_Patel
(2020-09-02, 08:03 PM)Sciborg_S_Patel Wrote: Yeah I would say ID is quite interesting, though I admittedly don't follow it too closely since I am already leaning toward the idea of spirits intervening in "material processes"...of course the word "spirit" itself invites questions.

The motivation that drives a good bit of the ID scholarship/funding seems to be trying to show there's a God by which they mean a conscious Ground of All Being. That I think is very very flawed thinking on their part b/c what ID purports to show is a weighting of mutation dice, and if nothing else [probability manipulation] is exactly what modern day magicians claim to do via some internal power and/or working with spirits.

Arguably even fine-tuning isn't absolute proof of big-G God but at the least you're talking about the fundamental structures of the Universe for some of that...

I would be more comfortable with "they mean a conscious Ground of All Being"  which is open and non specific as opposed to what I see as a whack a mole jesus that lurks in the DI ID agenda.
[-] The following 2 users Like Larry's post:
  • Sciborg_S_Patel, Typoz
(2020-09-03, 06:59 PM)Larry Wrote: I would be more comfortable with "they mean a conscious Ground of All Being"  which is open and non specific as opposed to what I see as a whack a mole jesus that lurks in the DI ID agenda.

Yeah I think both that and as Typoz notes those more fundamentalist in their atheist/materialist faith have aggrandized ID into something more than necessary, the contest of God's existence. ID has aspects that are incredibly interesting but not for the reasons either side desires/fears.

One thing I am not sure of it whether ID could simply be aliens of a "nuts & bolts", extraterrestrial variety? I've doubted this but when I reflect on it not sure why that couldn't be the case...
'Historically, we may regard materialism as a system of dogma set up to combat orthodox dogma...Accordingly we find that, as ancient orthodoxies disintegrate, materialism more and more gives way to scepticism.'

- Bertrand Russell


(This post was last modified: 2020-09-03, 07:51 PM by Sciborg_S_Patel.)
[-] The following 1 user Likes Sciborg_S_Patel's post:
  • Typoz
(2020-09-03, 07:45 PM)Sciborg_S_Patel Wrote: Yeah I think both that and as Typoz notes those more fundamentalist in their atheist/materialist faith have aggrandized ID into something more than necessary, the contest of God's existence. ID has aspects that are incredibly interesting but not for the reasons either side desires/fears.

One thing I am not sure of it whether ID could simply be aliens of a "nuts & bolts", extraterrestrial variety? I've doubted this but when I reflect on it not sure why that couldn't be the case...

Then there is always kick the can into the cosmos with panspermia raining in from the heavens as an option.
 I think the Christian fundamentalists (at the discovery institute)
 "faith have also aggrandized ID into something more than necessary" as well. It seems impossible to keep ones tribal social political religious leanings from influencing ones perception. 
[-] The following 2 users Like Larry's post:
  • stephenw, Sciborg_S_Patel

  • View a Printable Version
Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)