(2018-07-08, 11:50 AM)Jim_Smith Wrote: Hi,
I am wondering if the forums can be configured to enforce a daily limit for the maximum numbert of posts allowed for a user.
It if it possible I would like to request that a limit be set and automatically enforced.
This is a terrible idea, even for posters who spam the forum with bullshit, mildly racist propaganda.
(This post was last modified: 2018-07-09, 02:15 AM by berkelon.)
I wrote something approximately like this in a private message, maybe it will help ...
Quote:I don't watch TV because I don't like having to adjust my schedule to the tv station's schedule (i have an old analog set with a fat crt and a digital coverter box, and i don't get cable because I don't want to support fake news channels). I watch documentaries on youtube. I use an ad blocker so I don't ever see ads on youtube. I don't even use the youtube app on my android tablet, I go to the youtube web site with a browser so I can use an ad blocker. If I was watching tv and a lot of objectionable ads showed up I would change the channel or shut off the tv. The point is that I don't let technology run my life and I have a hard time understanding that people can allow it to run theirs to the point that it can upset them. Maybe that is why I have a hard time understanding the problem.
The first gulp from the glass of science will make you an atheist, but at the bottom of the glass God is waiting for you - Werner Heisenberg. (More at my Blog & Website)
(This post was last modified: 2018-07-09, 03:55 AM by Jim_Smith.)
(2018-07-09, 03:55 AM)Jim_Smith Wrote: I wrote something approximately like this in a private message, maybe it will help ...
From another pm I wrote:
Quote: It seems to me people are using the forum compulsively and blaming me because they can't control their compulsion. Oddly, that is something I can feel sympathy for.
The first gulp from the glass of science will make you an atheist, but at the bottom of the glass God is waiting for you - Werner Heisenberg. (More at my Blog & Website)
(This post was last modified: 2018-07-09, 06:02 AM by Jim_Smith.)
I am pretty sure that "no political bullshit" -out in the open- was one of the founding principles of this forum...
"Deep into that darkness peering, long I stood there, wondering, fearing, doubting, dreaming dreams no mortal ever dared to dream before..."
(This post was last modified: 2018-07-09, 06:41 AM by E. Flowers.)
(2018-07-09, 06:40 AM)E. Flowers Wrote: I am pretty sure that "no political bullshit" -out in the open- was one of the founding principles of this forum...
Maybe that’s why the President Trump thread is NOT ‘out in the open’?
Oh my God, I hate all this.
(2018-07-09, 06:49 AM)Stan Woolley Wrote: Maybe that’s why the President Trump thread is NOT ‘out in the open’?
Naturally.
Now... Why is this and "changed my avatar" 'out in the open'...?
"Deep into that darkness peering, long I stood there, wondering, fearing, doubting, dreaming dreams no mortal ever dared to dream before..."
(2018-07-09, 07:01 AM)E. Flowers Wrote: Naturally.
Now... Why is this and "changed my avatar" 'out in the open'...?
What do you propose? Hidden threads to post about the workings of hidden threads?
Oh my God, I hate all this.
(2018-07-09, 07:06 AM)Stan Woolley Wrote: What do you propose? Hidden threads to post about the workings of hidden threads?
Neither of these threads has any real value or the possibility of affecting the community at large.
Jim is just acting up, he knows (hell, we *all* know) that the community will not support a daily limit. And the diatribe explaining why he changed his avatar definitely belonged within the hidden forum.
"Deep into that darkness peering, long I stood there, wondering, fearing, doubting, dreaming dreams no mortal ever dared to dream before..."
I'm surmising that the reason people wanted the political discussions restricted - apart from the fact they have little to do with the focus of this forum - was that they were bound to be controversial and perhaps might degenerate in a similar manner to the Skeptiko forum. So, with the full knowledge that there would be provocative posts and emotional responses, we were given the opportunity to participate by intentionally opting-in.
Therefore, it seems ironic to me that the most provocative participant posting the most controversial opinions and propaganda should be the one who is also complaining about not getting enough likes (in a now-deleted post), about people getting upset and about some non-existent "witch hunt" (his words, mimicking Trump) supposedly preventing him from airing his views. Of course, like much of his propaganda, there is no truth in that nor any justification for his complaints.
I do not make any clear distinction between mind and God. God is what mind becomes when it has passed beyond the scale of our comprehension.
Freeman Dyson
(This post was last modified: 2018-07-09, 07:32 AM by Kamarling.)
(2018-07-08, 10:43 PM)malf Wrote: I think a posting limit would be counter productive and against the ethos of the forum. A little self awareness might go a long way though. We’ve all met the guy with a bee in his bonnet (one for the hatters there) over a particular issue. When he’s made his point several times but goes on and on about it all night, it gets boring and turns people off.
As one of my bosses was oft heard to say: “your argument is no more compelling for its repetition.”.
(This post was last modified: 2018-07-09, 08:19 AM by Obiwan.)
|