(2017-09-14, 05:02 PM)jkmac Wrote: I think it's pretty obvious. It would be evidence of exactly what they described: large objects moving through in the sky.
They don't need to suppose what those object are exactly, or guess what they are doing there, in order to put forward testimonial evidence that they saw and heard something, and this evidence should be seriously considered, and not simply ignored due to being "unscientific".
Do you consider those eyewitness accounts to be "scientific" evidence?