Sue Blackmore vs Graham Nichols Interview.

Very light and breezy, seemingly very reasonable, but when it comes down to it, she leans very heavily on a PhD that was gained years ago, and is unmovable in her views. That's my impression.

I seem to recall reading somewhere sometime ago that someone (apologies for the vagueness but she isn't someone I'm particularly interested in) else examined the results she gathered and which she cited in her own thesis and found evidence of an effect.

She seems to have made a career based on a piece of research didn't establish anything (to her) and in fact, perhaps based on data that proved the opposite. Great work if you can get it.