(2019-06-01, 09:10 PM)Raf999 Wrote: Macro-PK is moving or altering objects like Kulagina and Geller claimed, in my opinion.
That PEAR lab is the only decent result out of it, but pararesearcher sloppiness can't be denied. Nobody would have tested for OBEs and remote viewing inside a room while he was sleeping on the other side.
If you're counting the Random Mechanical Cascade as macro-PK, then I think you need to count dice studies as well. Those were done in large numbers in the mid-20th-century. The early studies were severely criticised, but it's been argued that the later, better conducted ones still show very significant results.
But probably this - and discussion of remote viewing - belong elsewhere rather than in this thread.