(2017-08-21, 04:11 PM)Obiwan Wrote: Who knows? The acid test is still the evidential content imho.Agreed. The good new is: there are LOTs of examples out there with solid evidential content.
Basically, if I was not already convinced of the validity of mediumship, these videos wouldn't be enough to convince me.
Here's what I consider to be a better example out of many that are available-
The medium correctly states:
- the husband's name,
- the fact that he died in the service,
- that he died in Iraq,
- that he was shot in the jaw/neck,
- and that he damaged the wedding picture.
The medium stated these things without equivocation, and didn't fish for validation.
I consider this a reading with strong veridical support. Notice also that there was very little that was said that was incorrect. The only thing I can think of is that she missed the date by one day (15th vs 16th).