Thank you for the Moreman reference.
Another study which looked at remarkable correspondences in a qualitative way in a control group was Kelly's An Investigation of Mediums Who Claim to Give Information About Deceased Persons. Out of 40 subject, she describes 5 subjects finding remarkable correspondences in the correct readings and "a few" subjects finding remarkable correspondences among the incorrect readings. 14 subjects in each group (correct and incorrect readings) also made more general comments about accuracy like "I knew this was the correct reading, it sounded just like my mom/daughter/husband". Note, in this case, there was a 1 in 4 base chance of choosing the correct reading, however the mediums weren't fully blind as to the subject of their reading.
Linda
Another study which looked at remarkable correspondences in a qualitative way in a control group was Kelly's An Investigation of Mediums Who Claim to Give Information About Deceased Persons. Out of 40 subject, she describes 5 subjects finding remarkable correspondences in the correct readings and "a few" subjects finding remarkable correspondences among the incorrect readings. 14 subjects in each group (correct and incorrect readings) also made more general comments about accuracy like "I knew this was the correct reading, it sounded just like my mom/daughter/husband". Note, in this case, there was a 1 in 4 base chance of choosing the correct reading, however the mediums weren't fully blind as to the subject of their reading.
Linda